不同土地利用方式土壤表层氮、磷流失特征研究
CHARACTERISTICS OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS LOSS FROM SURFACE SOIL IN DIFFERENT LANDUSE
-
摘要: 利用室内人工模拟降雨,选择徐州沛沿河流域3种典型土地利用类型,研究了不同土地利用下土壤表层N、P随降雨径流的迁移过程.研究结果表明,在相同降雨条件下,3种土地产流量大小顺序为稻田地>林地>果园,产泥沙量大小顺序为果园>稻田地>林地.降雨径流水相中TN、TP浓度呈现随降雨时间的持续显著下降,然后逐渐稳定的趋势,氮磷的流失量大小与土壤有效氮和速效磷含量高低具有一致性.径流水相中氮、磷流失以悬浮颗粒态为主.整个降雨过程氮素流失以径流水相为主,而磷素流失以泥沙相为主.土壤表层氮和磷流失速率最大的是稻田地,分别为1.12 mg·m-2·min-1和0.42 mg·m-2·min-1.Abstract: Three typical types of land in the northern area of Jiangsu Province were used to study nitrogen and phosphorus loss in artificial rain-runoff simulator. The results showed that the amount of runoff followed the order: paddy field>woodland >orchard under 80 mm·h-1 rainfall condition, and amount of sediment followed the order: orchard >paddy field>woodland. Nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in runoff initially decreased significantly with rainfall, then stabilized. The nitrogen and phosphorus loss correlates with the level of available nitrogen and Olsen-P content in soil. The main form of nitrogen and phosphorus loss was suspended particulate in runoff water. Nitrogen loss occured mainly in runoff water and phosphorus loss in sediment in the whole rainfall process.The maximum rate of nitrogen and phosphorus loss from surface soil occured in paddy field, which were 1.12 mg·m-2·min-1 and 0.42 mg·m-2·min-1, respectively.
-
Key words:
- different landuse /
- simulation rainfall /
- nitrogen and phosphorus losses /
- surface runoff
-
[1] Novotny V, Olem H. Water quality, prevention, identification and management of diffuse pollution [M]. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1993 [2] 秦伯强,杨柳燕,陈非洲,等. 湖泊富营养化发生机制与控制技术及其应用[J].科学通报,2006(16): 1857-1866 [3] 高超,朱建国,窦贻俭. 农业非点源污染对太湖水质的影响:发展态势与研究重点[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2002,11 (3) :260—263 [4] 全为民, 严力蛟.农业面源污染对水体富营养化的影响及其防治措施[J]. 生态学报,2002,22(3):291-299 [5] 王春光,叶水根.流域降雨量和土壤氮含量对流域出口氮污染负荷的影响[J].灌溉排水学报, 2005,24(6):15-18 [6] Smith K A,Jackson D R,Pepper T. Nutrient losses by surface runoff following the application of organic manures to arable land: Nitrogen[J].Environmental Pollution,2001,112:41-51 [7] 杨丽霞,杨桂山,苑韶峰,等.不同施肥水平下太湖流域典型蔬菜地土壤磷素径流特征[J].中国环境科学, 2007,27(4):518-523 [8] 王勇强,王玉宽,傅斌,等.不同耕作方式对紫色土侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(3):333-335 [9] 申震州, 姚文艺, 李勉,等. 不同下垫面对坡面侵蚀特征的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(1): 6-9 [10] 余进祥, 赵小敏, 吕琲,等. 鄱阳湖流域不同农业利用方式下的氮磷输出特征[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2010, 32(2): 394-402 [11] 徐向舟,刘大庆,张红武,等.室内人工模拟降雨实验研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(5):52-58 [12] 梁涛,王红萍,张秀梅,等.官厅水库周边不同土地利用方式下氮、磷非点源污染模拟研究[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(4):483-490 [13] 单保庆,尹澄清,于静,等.降雨-径流过程中土壤表层磷迁移过程的模拟研究[J].环境科学学报,2001,21(1):7-12 [14] 鲁如坤主编.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999 [15] 张瑞国,王克勤,陈奇伯,等. 昆明市水源区不同利用类型坡地径流氮和磷的输出特征[J].环境科学研究,2009,22(5):607-611 [16] 黄满湘,章申,唐以剑,等. 模拟降雨条件下农田径流中氮的流失过程[J]. 土壤与环境,2001,10(1):6-10
计量
- 文章访问数: 720
- HTML全文浏览数: 697
- PDF下载数: 597
- 施引文献: 0