高级搜索

大气PM2.5在线监测仪对SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定评价

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

袁超, 王韬, 高晓梅, 聂玮, 雷国强, 徐政, 王文兴. 大气PM2.5在线监测仪对SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定评价[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(11): 1808-1815.
引用本文: 袁超, 王韬, 高晓梅, 聂玮, 雷国强, 徐政, 王文兴. 大气PM2.5在线监测仪对SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定评价[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(11): 1808-1815.
shu
YUAN Chao, WANG Tao, GAO Xiaomei, NIE Wei, XU Zheng, WANG Wenxing, . Evaluation of SO42-, NO3- and NH4+ measurements using ambient PM2.5 real-time monitoring instruments[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1808-1815.
Citation: YUAN Chao, WANG Tao, GAO Xiaomei, NIE Wei, XU Zheng, WANG Wenxing, . Evaluation of SO42-, NO3- and NH4+ measurements using ambient PM2.5 real-time monitoring instruments[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1808-1815.
shu

大气PM2.5在线监测仪对SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定评价

  • 1.

    山东大学环境研究院, 济南, 250100;

  • 2.

    香港理工大学土木及环境工程系, 香港;

  • 3.

    香港特区政府环境保护署, 香港

  • 基金项目:

    香港环境及自然保育基金项目(2009-07)

    香港理工大学Niche Area Development(1-BB94)资助.

Evaluation of SO42-, NO3- and NH4+ measurements using ambient PM2.5 real-time monitoring instruments

  • 1.

    Environment Research Institute of Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China;

  • 2.

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China;

  • 3.

    Environmental Protection Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 通过两套大气细颗粒物(PM2.5)水溶性离子在线监测仪与蜂巢式固气分离器膜采样系统作对比,评估了在线监测仪器对主要水溶性组分SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定结果.美国URG 公司生产的在线连续监测分析系统(AIM URG-9000B)对NH4+和NO3-的监测结果较好,但对SO42-的测定结果存在明显高估,其原因是AIM的平板溶蚀器系统无法完全去除大气中高浓度SO2,从而对SO42-的测定结果有干扰.为解决这一问题,进行了一系列实验,结果表明采用两个溶蚀器串联并用5 mmol·L-1 H2O2+5 mmol·L-1 NaOH混合溶液作吸收液时,高浓度的SO2(甚至达到260 μg·m-3)可以被完全吸收而对SO42-的测定结果不产生影响.由荷兰能源研究所(ECN)、Metrohm和Applikon共同研制的在线气体组分及气溶胶监测系统(MARGA,ADI2080)对NH4+和SO42-的监测结果较好,可以满足实验要求;但NO3-的测定结果偏高,其准确性需作进一步评估.新型监测仪器在不同大气环境中投入使用前需进行对比测试,以确定其准确性和精确性.
    Abstract: Field studies were conducted in Hong Kong to assess two different real-time techniques for measuring SO42-, NO3- and NH4+ in PM2.5 by comparison with a honeycomb denuder filter-pack system. An ambient ion monitor (AIM, URG9000B) showed good performance for NO3- and NH4+, but obvious overestimation for SO42-, which was attributed to the positive interference by high ambient SO2 concentrations which could not be totally eliminated in the parallel denuder. To overcome this problem, a series of experiments were conducted, which lead to an improved system including two denuders working in series and with the use of a new denuder liquid (5 mmol·L-1 H2O2+5 mmol·L-1 NaOH). The new system could absorb high concentration of SO2 (even up to 260 μg·m-3) so that the SO42- measurement results would not be affected. Another monitor for measuring aerosols and gases (MARGA, Model ADI 2080), developed by ECN, Metrohm and Applikon, was also evaluated. MARGA showed excellent performance for the measurements of SO42- and NH4+, but exhibited high NO3- measurement results. The accuracy of NO3- measurements should be evaluated further. This study demonstrated the need for evaluating new measurement techniques in different atmospheric environments to determine the accuracy and precision of the measurements.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Gao X, Yang L, Cheng S, et al. Semi-continuous measurement of water-soluble ions in PM2.5 in Jinan, China: Temporal variations and source apportionments [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(33):6048-6056
    [2] Chow J. Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles [J]. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 1995, 45:320-382
    [3] Chan C, Yao X. Air pollution in mega cities in China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42 (1):1-42
    [4] Zhang Q, Jimenez J L, Canagaratna M R, et al. Ubiquity and dominance of oxygenated species in organic aerosols in anthropogenically-influenced Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2007, 34 (13): L13801. doi:10.1029/2007GL029979
    [5] Hering S, Cass G. The magnitude of bias in the measurement of PM2.5 arising from volatilisation of particulate nitrate from Teflon filters [J]. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 1999, 49:725-733
    [6] Zhang X, McMurry P. Evaporative losses of fine particulate nitrates during sampling [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1992, 26(18): 3305-3312
    [7] 寿幼平, 高晓梅, 王静, 等. 济南秋季大气 PM2.5 中水溶性离子的在线观测 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2010, 23: 41-47
    [8] Lee B K, Kim Y H, Lee D S. An automated and semi-continuous method for the analysis of water-soluble constituents in PM2.5 [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2008, 393(1): 145-153
    [9] Du H, Kong L, Cheng T, et al. Insights into ammonium particle-to-gas conversion: Non-sulfate ammonium coupling with nitrate and chloride [J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2010, 10:589-595
    [10] Dall'Osto M, Harrison R M, Coe H, et al. Real time chemical characterization of local and regional nitrate aerosols [J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2009, 9(11):3709-3720
    [11] Drewnick F, Schwab J, Hogrefe O, et al. Intercomparison and evaluation of four semi-continuous PM2.5 sulfate instruments [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(24):3335-3350
    [12] Wittig A E, Takahama S, Khlystov A Y, et al. Semi-continuous PM2.5 inorganic composition measurements during the Pittsburgh air quality study [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(20): 3201-3213
    [13] Han J S, Moon K J, Kong B J. Characterization of physical, chemical and optical properties of ambient aerosol as a function of relative humidity at Gosan, Korea During ABC-EAREX 2005. The 2006 International Aerosol Conference, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA,2006
    [14] Zhou Y, Wang T, Gao X, et al. Continuous observations of water-soluble ions in PM2.5 at Mount Tai (1534m asl) in central-eastern China [J]. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2010, 64(2-3):107-127
    [15] Wu W, Wang T. On the performance of a semi-continuous PM2.5 sulphate and nitrate instrument under high loadings of particulate and sulphur dioxide [J]. Atmospheric environment, 2007, 41(26):5442-5451
    [16] 周敏, 陈长虹, 王红丽. 上海市秋季典型大气高污染过程中颗粒物的化学组成变化特征[J].环境科学学报, 2012, 32(1):81-92
    [17] Li H, Han Z, Cheng T, et al. Agricultural fire impacts on the air quality of Shanghai during summer harvest time [J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2010, 10(2): 95-101
    [18] Makkonen U, Virkkula A, J Mäntykenttä, et al. Semi-continuous gas and inorganic aerosol measurements at a Finnish urban site: comparisons with filters, nitrogen in aerosol and gas phases, and aerosol acidity [J]. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss, 2012, 12:4755-4796
    [19] Pathak R K, Yao X, Chan C. Sampling artifacts of acidity and ionic species in PM2.5 [J]. Environmental science & technology, 2004, 38(1): 254-259
    [20] Hirsch R M, Gilroy E J. Methods of fitting a straight line to data: examples in water resources [J]. Water Resources Bulletin, 1984, 20 (5):705-711
    [21] Takeuchi M, Li J, Morris K J, et al. Membrane-based parallel plate denuder for the collection and removal of soluble atmospheric gases [J]. Analytical chemistry, 2004, 76(4):1204-1210
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  842
  • HTML全文浏览数:  792
  • PDF下载数:  956
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-03-30
袁超, 王韬, 高晓梅, 聂玮, 雷国强, 徐政, 王文兴. 大气PM2.5在线监测仪对SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定评价[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(11): 1808-1815.
引用本文: 袁超, 王韬, 高晓梅, 聂玮, 雷国强, 徐政, 王文兴. 大气PM2.5在线监测仪对SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定评价[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(11): 1808-1815.
shu
YUAN Chao, WANG Tao, GAO Xiaomei, NIE Wei, XU Zheng, WANG Wenxing, . Evaluation of SO42-, NO3- and NH4+ measurements using ambient PM2.5 real-time monitoring instruments[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1808-1815.
Citation: YUAN Chao, WANG Tao, GAO Xiaomei, NIE Wei, XU Zheng, WANG Wenxing, . Evaluation of SO42-, NO3- and NH4+ measurements using ambient PM2.5 real-time monitoring instruments[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1808-1815.
shu

大气PM2.5在线监测仪对SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定评价

  • 1.  山东大学环境研究院, 济南, 250100;
  • 2.  香港理工大学土木及环境工程系, 香港;
  • 3.  香港特区政府环境保护署, 香港
  • 收稿日期:  2012-03-30
基金项目:

香港环境及自然保育基金项目(2009-07)

香港理工大学Niche Area Development(1-BB94)资助.

摘要: 通过两套大气细颗粒物(PM2.5)水溶性离子在线监测仪与蜂巢式固气分离器膜采样系统作对比,评估了在线监测仪器对主要水溶性组分SO42-、NO3-和NH4+的测定结果.美国URG 公司生产的在线连续监测分析系统(AIM URG-9000B)对NH4+和NO3-的监测结果较好,但对SO42-的测定结果存在明显高估,其原因是AIM的平板溶蚀器系统无法完全去除大气中高浓度SO2,从而对SO42-的测定结果有干扰.为解决这一问题,进行了一系列实验,结果表明采用两个溶蚀器串联并用5 mmol·L-1 H2O2+5 mmol·L-1 NaOH混合溶液作吸收液时,高浓度的SO2(甚至达到260 μg·m-3)可以被完全吸收而对SO42-的测定结果不产生影响.由荷兰能源研究所(ECN)、Metrohm和Applikon共同研制的在线气体组分及气溶胶监测系统(MARGA,ADI2080)对NH4+和SO42-的监测结果较好,可以满足实验要求;但NO3-的测定结果偏高,其准确性需作进一步评估.新型监测仪器在不同大气环境中投入使用前需进行对比测试,以确定其准确性和精确性.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (21)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心