高级搜索

水汽对光腔衰荡光谱系统(CRDS)法测定CH4的影响

,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

臧昆鹏, 方双喜, 周凌晞, 姚波, 张芳, 刘立新. 水汽对光腔衰荡光谱系统(CRDS)法测定CH4的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(11): 1816-1820.
引用本文: 臧昆鹏, 方双喜, 周凌晞, 姚波, 张芳, 刘立新. 水汽对光腔衰荡光谱系统(CRDS)法测定CH4的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(11): 1816-1820.
shu
ZANG Kunpeng, FANG Shuangxi, ZHOU Lingxi, YAO Bo, ZHANG Fang, LIU Lixin. The influence of water wapor on the measurement of CH4 by CRDS system[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1816-1820.
Citation: ZANG Kunpeng, FANG Shuangxi, ZHOU Lingxi, YAO Bo, ZHANG Fang, LIU Lixin. The influence of water wapor on the measurement of CH4 by CRDS system[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1816-1820.
shu

水汽对光腔衰荡光谱系统(CRDS)法测定CH4的影响

  • 1.

    中国气象科学研究院, 北京, 100081;

  • 2.

    国家海洋环境监测中心, 大连, 116023

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41175116)

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2010CB950601)

    科技部国际合作项目(2011DFA21090)资助.

The influence of water wapor on the measurement of CH4 by CRDS system

  • 1.

    Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China;

  • 2.

    National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center, Dalian, 116023, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 分析了CRDS法测定CH4浓度与水汽含量间的关系,并建立了水汽含量在0.50%-2.45%(体积比,以V/V表示,下同)范围内的有效校正方法.采用CRDS法对水汽含量为0.93%的CH4标气进行多次测量,测量值经校正后与理论值的偏差均小于2.0×10-9(体积比,以V/V表示,下同),最大偏差1.8×10-9, 优于大气本底CH4观测质控标准.校正瓦里关站CRDS系统试运行期间的CH4实测数据(水汽含量为0.50%-2.45%),与该站气相色谱-氢火焰离子化检测器系统(GC-FID系统,下同)同期测量结果相比,38.48%的数据偏差小于2.0×10-9,说明在系统未配备超低温冷阱除水单元之前,本文研究的校正方法适用于观测数据的校正.
    Abstract: The Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (CRDS) system has been introduced to measure methane (CH4) in the background area. It has been proved that the concentration of CH4 measured by CRDS system was affected by the water vapor distinctly. In order to ensure the reliability of the observed data. The relationship between CH4 and water vapor measured by CRDS system was studied, and an effective correction method for water vapor in the rang of 0.50%-2.45% (V/V) was established. The method validation showed that the deviations between the correction results and the theoretical value were less than 1.8�10-9, which was better than the goal of background atmospheric measurement. Finally, the correction method was used to deal with the CH4 data measured by the CRDS system at Waliguan Station (the water vapor ranged from 0.50% to 2.45%, V/V), and compared with the data measured by GC-FID system at the same time. The correction results showed the less deviation than 2.0�10-9 for 38.48% measured data.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Khalil M A K, Rasmussen R A. Atmospheric methane trends over the last 10000 years[J]. Atmos Environ, 1984, 21: 2445-2452
    [2] IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007
    [3] World Meteorological Organization(WMO). Greenhouse gas bulletin: the state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere using global observations through 2009 [R]. World Meteordogical Organization(WMO), 2010
    [4] 王木林,李兴生. 大气本底监测站的CH4, CO2和CO浓度的初步分析. 北京:气象出版社,1986: 172-185
    [5] Wang M X, Liu W W, Rasmussen R A, et al. Long-term trend and seasonal cycle of atmospheric methane [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1990, 35(3): 213-216
    [6] Crutzen P J. On the role of CH4 in atmospheric chemistry: Sources, sinks and possible reductions in anthropogenic sources [J]. Ambio, 1995, 24(1): 52-55
    [7] Lelieveld J, Crutzen P J, Dentener F J. Changing concentration, lifetime and climate forcing of atmospheric methane [J]. Tellus, 1998, 50B(2): 128-150
    [8] Artuso F, Chamard P, Piacentino S, et al. Atmospheric methane in the Mediterranean: Analysis of measurements at the island of Lampedusa during 1995-2005 [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41: 3877-3888
    [9] Zhou L X, Worthy D E J, Lang P M, et al. Ten years of atmospheric methane observations at a high elevation site in western China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004,38: 7041-7054
    [10] 周凌晞,汤洁,张晓春,等.气相色谱法观测本底大气中的甲烷和二氧化碳[J]. 环境科学学报, 1998,18(4): 356-361
    [11] 周凌晞,汤洁,温玉璞,等.瓦里关山大气甲烷本底浓度变化特征的分析[J]. 应用气象学报, 1998, 9(4): 385-391
    [12] 周凌晞,李金龙,汤洁,等.瓦里关山大气CH4本底变化[J]. 环境科学学报, 2004, 24(2): 91-95
    [13] 周凌晞,周秀骥,张晓春,等.瓦里关温室气体本底研究的主要进展[J]. 气象学报, 2007, 65(3): 458-468
    [14] 刘立新,周凌晞,温民,等.中国4个国家级野外站大气CH4本底浓度变化特征[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2009, 5(5): 285-290
    [15] 方双喜,周凌晞,张芳,等.双通道气相色谱法观测本底大气中的CH4、CO、N2O和SF6 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2010, 30(1): 52-59
    [16] Chen H, Winderlich J, Gerbig C, et al. High-accuracy continuous airborne measurements of greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4) during BARCA [J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2010, 3: 375-386
    [17] Crosson E R. A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels of methane, carbon dioxide and water vapor [J]. Applied Physics, 2008, B92: 403-408
    [18] 臧昆鹏,周凌晞,方双喜,等. 新型CO2和CH4混合标气标校流程及方法[J]. 环境化学, 2011, 30(2): 505-510
    [19] 方双喜,周凌晞,臧昆鹏,等. 光强衰荡光谱(CRDS)法观测我国4个本底站大气CO2 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2010, 31(3): 624-629
    [20] Barbara A, Paldus, Alexandar A, et al. An historical overview of cavity methods (Einstein centennial review article) [J]. Canadian Journal of Physics, 2005, 83: 975-999
    [21] Wastine B, Kaiser C, Vuillemin C, et al. Evaluation of the Picarro EnviroSense 3000i analysers (now called G1301) for continuous CO2/CH4 measurements. EGU General Assembly 2009, Vienna Austria,2009:2562
    [22] Wahl Edward H, Tan S M, Koulikov Sergei, et al. Ultra-sensitive ethylene post-harvest monitor based on cavity ring-down spectroscopy [J]. Optics Express, 2006, 14(4): 1673-1684
    [23] Etheridgea D, Luhara A, Loha Z, et al. Atmospheric monitoring of the CO2 CRC Otway Project and lessons for large scale CO2 storage projects [J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 3666-3675
    [24] Turnbull J C, Karion A, Fischer M L, et al. Assessment of fossil fuel carbon dioxide and other anthropogenic trace gas emissions from airborne measurements over Sacramento, California in spring 2009[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 11: 705-721
    [25] Kessler John D, Valentine David L, Redmond Molly C, et al. A persistent oxygen anomaly reveals the fate of spilled methane in the deep Gulf of Mexico[J]. Science, 2011, DOI:10.1126/science.1199697
    [26] Expert group recommendations. The 14th WMO/IAEA meeting of experts on carbon dioxide concentration and related tracers measurement techniques (WMO TD No.1487). Helsinki, Finland,2007
    [27] World Meteorological Organization(WMO). Global atmosphere watch measurements guide (WMO TD, No.1073)[C]. Geneva, Switzerland, 2001
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1027
  • HTML全文浏览数:  987
  • PDF下载数:  583
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-01-16
臧昆鹏, 方双喜, 周凌晞, 姚波, 张芳, 刘立新. 水汽对光腔衰荡光谱系统(CRDS)法测定CH4的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(11): 1816-1820.
引用本文: 臧昆鹏, 方双喜, 周凌晞, 姚波, 张芳, 刘立新. 水汽对光腔衰荡光谱系统(CRDS)法测定CH4的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(11): 1816-1820.
shu
ZANG Kunpeng, FANG Shuangxi, ZHOU Lingxi, YAO Bo, ZHANG Fang, LIU Lixin. The influence of water wapor on the measurement of CH4 by CRDS system[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1816-1820.
Citation: ZANG Kunpeng, FANG Shuangxi, ZHOU Lingxi, YAO Bo, ZHANG Fang, LIU Lixin. The influence of water wapor on the measurement of CH4 by CRDS system[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2012, 31(11): 1816-1820.
shu

水汽对光腔衰荡光谱系统(CRDS)法测定CH4的影响

  • 1.  中国气象科学研究院, 北京, 100081;
  • 2.  国家海洋环境监测中心, 大连, 116023
  • 收稿日期:  2012-01-16
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41175116)

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2010CB950601)

科技部国际合作项目(2011DFA21090)资助.

摘要: 分析了CRDS法测定CH4浓度与水汽含量间的关系,并建立了水汽含量在0.50%-2.45%(体积比,以V/V表示,下同)范围内的有效校正方法.采用CRDS法对水汽含量为0.93%的CH4标气进行多次测量,测量值经校正后与理论值的偏差均小于2.0×10-9(体积比,以V/V表示,下同),最大偏差1.8×10-9, 优于大气本底CH4观测质控标准.校正瓦里关站CRDS系统试运行期间的CH4实测数据(水汽含量为0.50%-2.45%),与该站气相色谱-氢火焰离子化检测器系统(GC-FID系统,下同)同期测量结果相比,38.48%的数据偏差小于2.0×10-9,说明在系统未配备超低温冷阱除水单元之前,本文研究的校正方法适用于观测数据的校正.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (27)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心