高级搜索

荧光猝灭法测定菲、苊、芘与腐殖酸的结合常数

,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

邢冠华, 薛蓓, 胡璟, 张梦妮, 陶澍. 荧光猝灭法测定菲、苊、芘与腐殖酸的结合常数[J]. 环境化学, 2005, 24(5): 578-581.
引用本文: 邢冠华, 薛蓓, 胡璟, 张梦妮, 陶澍. 荧光猝灭法测定菲、苊、芘与腐殖酸的结合常数[J]. 环境化学, 2005, 24(5): 578-581.
shu
XING Guan-hua, XUE Bei, HU Jing, ZHANG Meng-ni, TAO Shu. DETERMINATION OF KDOC OF PHENANTHRENE,ACENAPHTHYLENE AND PYRENE BINDING TO HUMIC SUBSTANCES USING FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING METHOD[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2005, 24(5): 578-581.
Citation: XING Guan-hua, XUE Bei, HU Jing, ZHANG Meng-ni, TAO Shu. DETERMINATION OF KDOC OF PHENANTHRENE,ACENAPHTHYLENE AND PYRENE BINDING TO HUMIC SUBSTANCES USING FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING METHOD[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2005, 24(5): 578-581.
shu

荧光猝灭法测定菲、苊、芘与腐殖酸的结合常数

  • 1.

    北京大学环境学院, 地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京, 100871

  • 基金项目:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(2003CB415004)

    国家自然科学基金(40332015,40021101)资助项目

DETERMINATION OF KDOC OF PHENANTHRENE,ACENAPHTHYLENE AND PYRENE BINDING TO HUMIC SUBSTANCES USING FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING METHOD

  • 1.

    Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 用荧光猝灭法测定了胡敏酸(Fluka)与苊、菲和芘相互作用的结合常数(KDOC),其lgKDOC值分别为4.4,4.48和4.89.用同样方法测得长江水生FA以及黑龙江水生FA和HA的KDOC之间有显著差别.HA的KDOC一般高于FA.黑龙江水生FA的KDOC高于长江.对同一来源的腐殖酸,三种多环芳烃的KDOC与KOW呈线性相关.
    Abstract: KDOC of phenanthrene acenaphthylene and, pyrene binding to dissol ved humic substances were determined using fluorescence quenching method. The me asured lgKDOC of humic acid are 4.40,4.48 and 4.89,respectively.The procedure was used to measure the KDOC of aquatic FA from Heilong ri ver and Yangtze river and HA from Heilong river. Difference in binding capacity of these samples were identified.KDOC of HA was generally higher t han those of FA and KDOC of samples from Heilong river was higher than that from Yangtze river. Linear correlation between KDOC and KOW was found for humic substances from same origin.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Akkanen J, Penttinen S, Haitzer M et al.,Bioavailability of Atrazine, Pyrene and Benzo[a] pyrene in European River Waters [J] .Chemosphere,2001,45∶453-462
    [2] Meems N, Steinberg C E W, Wiegand C, Direct and Interacting Toxicological Effects on the Waterflea (Daphnia Magna) by Natural Organic Matter, Synthetic Humic Substances and Cypermthrin[J] .Sci.Total Environ., 2004,319∶123-136
    [3] Gauthier T D, Shane E C, Guerin W F et al.,Fluorescence Quenching Method for Determining Equilibrium Constants for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Binding to Dissolved Humic Materials [J] .Environ. Sci. Technol.,1986,20∶1162-1166
    [4] Raber B, Kogel-Knabner I, Stein C et al.,Partitioning of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons to Dissolved Organic Matter from Different Soils [J] .Chemosphere,1998,36(1)∶79-97
    [5] Burkhard L P, Estimating Dissolved Organic Carbon Partition Coefficients for Nonionic Organic Chemicals [J] .Environ. Sci.Technol.,2000,34∶4663-4668
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  651
  • HTML全文浏览数:  651
  • PDF下载数:  307
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2005-02-04
邢冠华, 薛蓓, 胡璟, 张梦妮, 陶澍. 荧光猝灭法测定菲、苊、芘与腐殖酸的结合常数[J]. 环境化学, 2005, 24(5): 578-581.
引用本文: 邢冠华, 薛蓓, 胡璟, 张梦妮, 陶澍. 荧光猝灭法测定菲、苊、芘与腐殖酸的结合常数[J]. 环境化学, 2005, 24(5): 578-581.
shu
XING Guan-hua, XUE Bei, HU Jing, ZHANG Meng-ni, TAO Shu. DETERMINATION OF KDOC OF PHENANTHRENE,ACENAPHTHYLENE AND PYRENE BINDING TO HUMIC SUBSTANCES USING FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING METHOD[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2005, 24(5): 578-581.
Citation: XING Guan-hua, XUE Bei, HU Jing, ZHANG Meng-ni, TAO Shu. DETERMINATION OF KDOC OF PHENANTHRENE,ACENAPHTHYLENE AND PYRENE BINDING TO HUMIC SUBSTANCES USING FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING METHOD[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2005, 24(5): 578-581.
shu

荧光猝灭法测定菲、苊、芘与腐殖酸的结合常数

  • 1. 北京大学环境学院, 地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京, 100871
  • 收稿日期:  2005-02-04
基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(2003CB415004)

国家自然科学基金(40332015,40021101)资助项目

摘要: 用荧光猝灭法测定了胡敏酸(Fluka)与苊、菲和芘相互作用的结合常数(KDOC),其lgKDOC值分别为4.4,4.48和4.89.用同样方法测得长江水生FA以及黑龙江水生FA和HA的KDOC之间有显著差别.HA的KDOC一般高于FA.黑龙江水生FA的KDOC高于长江.对同一来源的腐殖酸,三种多环芳烃的KDOC与KOW呈线性相关.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (5)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心