高级搜索

不同酸化体系测定中国不同地区土壤重金属的比较研究

,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

李强, 曹莹, 高存富, 刘亚峰, 周密, 刘晓雪. 不同酸化体系测定中国不同地区土壤重金属的比较研究[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (4): 1153-1157.
引用本文: 李强, 曹莹, 高存富, 刘亚峰, 周密, 刘晓雪. 不同酸化体系测定中国不同地区土壤重金属的比较研究[J]. 环境化学, 2020, (4): 1153-1157.
shu
LI Qiang, CAO Ying, GAO Cunfu, LIU Yafeng, ZHOU Mi, LIU Xiaoxue. Comparative study of acidification systems for determination of heavy metals in soils from different areas in China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (4): 1153-1157.
Citation: LI Qiang, CAO Ying, GAO Cunfu, LIU Yafeng, ZHOU Mi, LIU Xiaoxue. Comparative study of acidification systems for determination of heavy metals in soils from different areas in China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2020, (4): 1153-1157.
shu

不同酸化体系测定中国不同地区土壤重金属的比较研究

  • 中国环境科学研究院, 环境分析测试技术中心, 北京, 100012

    • 通讯作者: 曹莹, E-mail: caoying@craes.org.cn ; 
  • 基金项目:

    国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFC1802200，2019YFC180052）资助.

Comparative study of acidification systems for determination of heavy metals in soils from different areas in China

  • Environmental Analysis and Testing Laboratory of CRAES, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China

    • Corresponding author: CAO Ying, caoying@craes.org.cn ; 
  • Fund Project: Supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (2018YFC1802200,2019YFC180052).

  • 摘要: 本文采用硝酸-氢氟酸-盐酸-过氧化氢（5∶1∶1∶1）的消解体系和硝酸-过氧化氢（6∶2）消解体系，均通过微波消解法和电感耦合等离子体质谱法（ICP-MS）测定土壤中的铬、镍、铜、锌、砷、镉、铅等7种元素.分析了来自全国不同地区的9种土壤与水系沉积物的质控样品，研究了全量微波消解酸体系对土壤中7种重金属测定的影响.结果表明，对于Cr和Pb元素，硝酸-过氧化氢消解体系可溶态元素的结果显著低于元素全量的结果，未加入氢氟酸，难以将硅晶格中的Cr和Pb析出.对于As元素，硝酸-氢氟酸-盐酸-过氧化氢消解体系的回收率略有偏高，推测其原因为盐酸引入的氯离子对ICP-MS的测定产生了质谱型干扰，因此消解体系应尽量避免引入氯.对于Ni、Cu和Zn的结果，硝酸-过氧化氢消解体系的回收率在75%—110%的范围，两种消解体系结果的偏差较小，硝酸-过氧化氢法测定的可溶态元素的结果可以较好的反映元素全量的水平.对比不同地区土壤的结果发现，除水系沉积物和砖红壤中的Pb及砖红壤中的Cr，土壤中部分Cr和Pb难以被硝酸-过氧化氢体系消解出来，在环境中处于稳定的状态，因此采用硝酸-过氧化氢体系能更准确地评估Cr和Pb对环境的危害.
    Abstract: In this paper, the digestion system of nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid-hydrochloric acid-hydrogen peroxide (5∶1∶1∶1) and the digestion system of nitric acid-hydrogen peroxide (6∶2) were uesd. Seven elements of chromium, nickel, copper, zinc, arsenic, cadmium and lead in soil were analyzed by microwave digestion and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Nine quality control samples of soil and sediment from different parts of the country were analyzed. The effects of full microwave digestion acid system on the determination of seven heavy metals in soil were studied. The results showed that for Cr and Pb elements, the results of the soluble elements by the nitric acid-hydrogen peroxide method were significantly lower than the results of the total amount of elements by the nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid-hydrochloric acid-hydrogen peroxide method. Without the addition of hydrofluoric acid, it was difficult to dissociate Cr and Pb from the silicon lattice. For As element, the recovery of the nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid-hydrochloric acid-hydrogen peroxide digestion system was slightly higher. It was speculated that the reason was that the chloride ion introduced by hydrochloric acid had caused mass spectrometry interference in the measurement of ICP-MS, so the digestion system should avoid introducing chlorine. For the results of Ni, Cu and Zn, the recovery rate of the nitric acid-hydrogen peroxide digestion system was in the range of 75%—110%. The deviation of the results of the two digestion systems was low. So the results of the soluble element determination by the nitric acid-hydrogen peroxide method could well reflect the level of the total amount of elements. Comparing the results of soils in different regions, it was found that part of Cr and Pb in the soil was difficult to be completely digested by the nitric acid-hydrogen peroxide system and was in a stable state in the environment. This result was not applicable to Pb in sediment and laterite and Cr in laterite. Therefore, the use of the nitric acid-hydrogen peroxide system could more accurately assess the environmental damage of Cr and Pb.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 田衎,邢书才,杨郡,等.土壤/沉积物中重金属元素分析的前处理技术研究进展[J]. 光谱实验室,2012,29(1):247-251.

    TIAN Y, XING S C, YANG J, et al. Advances in pretreatment techniques for analysis of heavy metal elements in soil/sediment[J]. Chinese Journal of Spectroscopy Laboratory, 2012, 29(1):247-251(in Chinese).

    [2] 刘传娟, 刘凤枝, 蔡彦明,等.不同前处理方法-ICP-MS测定土壤中的重金属[J]. 分析实验室,2009,28(z1):91-94.

    LIU C J, LIU F Z, CAI Y M, et al. Determination of heavy metals in soil by different pretreatment methods-ICP-MS[J]. Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory, 2009, 28(z1):91-94(in Chinese).

    [3] FALCIANI R, NOVARO E, MARCHESINI M. Multi-element analysis of soil and sediment by ICP-MS after a microware assisted digestion method[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2000, 15:561-565.
    [4] 王媛,余全智,肖正龙,等.土壤中重金属监测前处理方法研究[J]. 环境与发展,2019,31(2):177-179.

    WANG Y, YU Z Q, XIAO Z L, et al. Study on pretreatment methods for monitoring heavy metals in soil[J]. Environment and Development, 2019, 31(2):177-179(in Chinese).

    [5] 刀谞,霍晓芹,张霖琳,等.我国土壤中主要元素监测技术及难点[J]. 中国环境监测,2018,34(5):17-26.

    DAO X, HUO X Q, ZHANG L L, et al. Over view of main soil element heavy metal monitoring technology and difficulties in China[J].Environmental Monitoring in China, 2018, 34(5):17-26(in Chinese).

    [6] SUN Y M, LI H, GUO G L, et al. Soil contamination in China:Current priorities, defining background levels and standards for heavy metals[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 251:109512.
    [7] 赵小学,赵宗生,陈纯,等.电感耦合等离子体-质谱法内标元素选择的研究[J]. 中国环境监测,2016,32(1):84-87.

    ZHAO X X, ZHAO Z S, CHEN C, et al. Selection of internal standard elements for inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2016, 32(1):84-87(in Chinese).

    [8] GUO W, HUA S H, ZHANG J Y, et al. Elimination of oxide interferences and determination of ultra-trace silver in soils by ICP-MS with ion-molecule reactions[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2011, 409(15):2981-2986.
    [9] 孙婧,马丽,杨兆光,等. 混酸微波辅助萃取ICP-MS测定不同性质土壤中的重金属元素[J]. 环境化学,2015,34(6):1057-1063.

    SUN J, MA L, YANG Z G, et al. Determination of heavy metal elements in various soils by microwave assisted extraction with acid mixture and ICP-MS[J].Environmental Chemistry, 2015, 34(6):1057-1063(in Chinese).

    [10] 李冰,周剑雄,詹秀春. 无机多元素现代仪器分析技术[J]. 地质学报,2011,85(11):1878-1916.

    LI B, ZHOU J X, ZHAN X C, et al. Inorganic multi-element modern instrument analysis technology[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2011, 85(11):1878-1916(in Chinese).

    [11] 全继宏,刘真贞,郑明明,等.碰撞池ICP-MS测定土壤中的V、Cr、Mn、Fe[J]. 环境科学与技术,2015,38(6):524-526.

    QUAN J H,LIU Z Z, ZHENG M M, et al. Determination of V, Cr, Mn,Fe in soil by collision cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, 38(6):524-526(in Chinese).

    [12] 王俊伟,钱蜀,李海霞,等.微波消解-ICP-MS测定土壤和水系沉积物中的重金属[J]. 四川环境,2010,29(6):40-43.

    WANG J W, QIAN S, LI H X, et al. Determination of heavy metaisin soils and sediments by microwave-assisted digestion and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Sichuan Environment, 2010, 29(6):40-43(in Chinese).

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1401
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1401
  • PDF下载数:  47
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程

不同酸化体系测定中国不同地区土壤重金属的比较研究

    通讯作者: 曹莹, E-mail: caoying@craes.org.cn ; 
  • 中国环境科学研究院, 环境分析测试技术中心, 北京, 100012
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFC1802200，2019YFC180052）资助.

摘要: 本文采用硝酸-氢氟酸-盐酸-过氧化氢（5∶1∶1∶1）的消解体系和硝酸-过氧化氢（6∶2）消解体系，均通过微波消解法和电感耦合等离子体质谱法（ICP-MS）测定土壤中的铬、镍、铜、锌、砷、镉、铅等7种元素.分析了来自全国不同地区的9种土壤与水系沉积物的质控样品，研究了全量微波消解酸体系对土壤中7种重金属测定的影响.结果表明，对于Cr和Pb元素，硝酸-过氧化氢消解体系可溶态元素的结果显著低于元素全量的结果，未加入氢氟酸，难以将硅晶格中的Cr和Pb析出.对于As元素，硝酸-氢氟酸-盐酸-过氧化氢消解体系的回收率略有偏高，推测其原因为盐酸引入的氯离子对ICP-MS的测定产生了质谱型干扰，因此消解体系应尽量避免引入氯.对于Ni、Cu和Zn的结果，硝酸-过氧化氢消解体系的回收率在75%—110%的范围，两种消解体系结果的偏差较小，硝酸-过氧化氢法测定的可溶态元素的结果可以较好的反映元素全量的水平.对比不同地区土壤的结果发现，除水系沉积物和砖红壤中的Pb及砖红壤中的Cr，土壤中部分Cr和Pb难以被硝酸-过氧化氢体系消解出来，在环境中处于稳定的状态，因此采用硝酸-过氧化氢体系能更准确地评估Cr和Pb对环境的危害.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (12)

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心