高级搜索

响应面法优化克浅十油田废水的混凝沉淀工艺

,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

张会琴, 叶春松, 阳红, 张弦, 杨帆, 刘广容. 响应面法优化克浅十油田废水的混凝沉淀工艺[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(1): 169-174.
引用本文: 张会琴, 叶春松, 阳红, 张弦, 杨帆, 刘广容. 响应面法优化克浅十油田废水的混凝沉淀工艺[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(1): 169-174.
shu
Zhang Huiqin, Ye Chunsong, Yang Hong, Zhang Xian, Yang Fan, Liu Guangrong. Optimization for treatment of oil field wastewater by coagulation sedimentation process using response surface methodology[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(1): 169-174.
Citation: Zhang Huiqin, Ye Chunsong, Yang Hong, Zhang Xian, Yang Fan, Liu Guangrong. Optimization for treatment of oil field wastewater by coagulation sedimentation process using response surface methodology[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(1): 169-174.
shu

响应面法优化克浅十油田废水的混凝沉淀工艺

  • 1.

    武汉大学动力与机械学院, 武汉 430072

  • 2.

    湖北工业大学化学与环境工程学院,武汉 430068

  • 3.

    中船重工环境工程有限公司,武汉 430064

  • 基金项目:

    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(208274060)

    生物地质与环境地质国家重点实验室开放基金项目(BGEG201101)

  • 中图分类号: X703.1

Optimization for treatment of oil field wastewater by coagulation sedimentation process using response surface methodology

  • 1.

    School of Power and Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

  • 2.

    School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China

  • 3.

    CSIC Environmental Engineering Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430064, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 以克浅十污水处理站原水为研究对象,采用混凝沉淀工艺,探讨优选出的复配混凝剂投加量、助凝剂投加量及静置时间对原水中浊度和总铁去除效果的影响。应用Box-Behnken中心组合实验和响应面分析法,建立混凝剂对处理原水的二次多项式数学模型,确定了混凝沉淀去除原水浊度和总铁的优化工艺参数分别为:复配混凝剂投加量为152.15 mg/L、143.84 mg/L,助凝剂投加量为4.14 mg/L、4.32 mg/L,静置时间为11.77 min、11.22 min。在此工艺条件下回归方程得到的浊度和总铁的去除率预测值与实验值接近,且拟合性良好,误差介于3%~5%之间。通过均值内插法,对比浊度和总铁的多元二次回归方程,推导得出的2组最佳工艺条件均能满足浊度和总铁的去除要求。
    Abstract: The effects of composite inorganic polymer flocculent (IPF), organic polymer flocculent (OPF) quantity and settling time on the removal of turbidity and total iron from oil field wastewater by means of coagulation were investigated. Optimized parameters on the coagulation sedimentation process by Box-Behnken centre-united experiment design and response surface methodology (RSM) to establish a predictive polynomial quadratic model were found to be IPF dosage of 152.15 mg/L and 143.84 mg/L, OPF of 4.14 mg/L and 4.32 mg/L, settling time of 11.77 min and 11.22 min. The experimental results of the removal rates of turbidity and total iron under the optimized condition presented better agreement with the predicted values and the deviation error was only 3%~5%. In order to compare the multivariate quadratic regression equations of turbidity and total iron, mean interpolation method was used and the two sets of optimized conditions proved to be suitable.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 沈德煌, 张义堂, 张霞, 等. 稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐后转注CO2吞吐开采研究. 石油学报, 2005, 26 (1):83-86 Shen D. H., Zhang Y. T., Zhang X., et al. Study on cyclic carbon dioxide injection after steam soak in heavy oil reservoir. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2005, 26 (1): 83-86 (in Chinese)
    [2] 李金林, 于鹭. 稠油废水回用热采锅炉供水工艺与工程实践. 工业水处理, 2006, 26 (5): 87-90 Li J. L., Yu L. Advanced treatment process and engineering practice for treated heavy oil produced wastewater reuse for thermal recovery boilers. Industrial Water Treatment, 2006, 26(5): 87-90 (in Chinese)
    [3] 曾玉彬, 杨昌柱, 张报, 等. 化学混凝法去除油废水中的硅. 化工环保, 2006, 27(2): 172-176 Zeng Y. B., Yang C. Z., Zhang B., et al. Removal of silica from heavy oil wastewater by chemical coagulation process. Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2006, 27(2): 172-176 (in Chinese)
    [4] 曾玉彬, 王益军, 张学鲁, 等. 稠油污水回用热采锅炉的中试研究. 工业水处理,2007, 27(7): 20-23 Zeng Y. B., Wang Y. J., Zhang X. L., et al. Pilot study on the treatment of produced wastewater from heavy oil to be reused in steam boiler. Industrial Water Treatment, 2007, 27(7): 20-23 (in Chinese)
    [5] 曾玉彬, 张学鲁, 杨东威, 等. 改性纤维球在稠油污水回用于锅炉用水的实验. 工业用水与废水, 2007, 38(3): 66-69 Zeng Y. B., Zhang X. L., Yang D. W., et al. Application of modified fiber ball in reuse of heavy oil wastewater as boiler water. Industrial Water & Wastewater, 2007, 38(3): 66-69 (in Chinese)
    [6] 鄢建成, 王丽娜. 玉门油田废水降铁实验研究. 广州化工, 2006, 34(2): 60-62 Yan J. C., Wang L. N. Research on the experiment of decreasing iron in Yumen oil field wastewater. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2006, 34(2): 60-62 (in Chinese)
    [7] 罗平, 贾晓燕, 刘文波. 高浓度味精废水预处理实验. 重庆大学学报, 2004, 27(5): 45-47 Luo P., Jia X. Y., Liu W. B. Treatment of tick effluent from monosodium glutamate production. Journal of Chongqing University, 2004, 27(5): 45-47 (in Chinese)
    [8] 胡勇有, 罗肖肖, 程建华, 等. 吸附-生物降解工艺化学强化除磷的实验研究. 华南理工大学学报, 2008, 36(12): 61-65 Hu Y. Y., Luo X. X., Cheng J. H., et al. Experimental investigation of chemically-Enhanced phosphorus removal with adsorption-biodegradation process. Journal of South China University of Technology, 2008, 36(12): 61-65 (in Chinese)
    [9] Li Y., Cui F. J., Liu Z. Q., et al. Improvement of xylanase production by Penicillium oxalicum ZH-30 using response surface methodology. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2007, 40(5): 1381-1388
    [10] Karacan F., Ozden U., Karacan S. Optimization of manufacturing conditions for activated carbon from Turkish lignite by chemical activation using response surface methodology. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27(7): 1212-1218
    [11] Zhang Z. M., Zheng H. L. Optimization for decolorization of azo dye acid green 20 by ultrasound and H2O2 using response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 172(2-3): 1388-1393
    [12] Zhu X. B., Tian J. P., Liu R., et al. Optimization of Fenton and electro-Fenton oxidation of biologically treated coking wastewater using response surface methodology. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 81(3): 444-450
    [13] 郑怀礼, 焦世珺, 邓晓莉, 等. 响应面法优化聚磷硫酸铁的制备及其应用. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(1): 9-14 Zheng H. L., Jiao S. J., Deng X. L., et al. Optimization of preparation and application of PPFS by response surface methodology. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(1): 9-14 (in Chinese)
    [14] 郑怀礼, 张会琴, 何强, 等. 响应曲面法优化降解直接深棕染料废水的低频超声工艺. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2010, 32(5): 71-75 Zheng H. L., Zhang H. Q., He Q., et al. Optimization of ultrasonic de-colorization of direct dark drown MM by Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2010, 32(5): 71-75 (in Chinese)
    [15] Li X. D., Jia R., Li P. S., et al. Response surface analysis for enzymatic decolorization of Congo red by manganese peroxidase. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B:Enzymatic, 2009, 56(1): 1-6
    [16] Murugesan K., Dhamija A., Nam I., et al. Decolourization of reactive black 5 by laccase: Optimization by response surface methodology. Dyes Pigments, 2007, 75(1): 176-184
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2021
  • HTML全文浏览数:  933
  • PDF下载数:  1274
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-03-20
  • 刊出日期:  2013-01-16
张会琴, 叶春松, 阳红, 张弦, 杨帆, 刘广容. 响应面法优化克浅十油田废水的混凝沉淀工艺[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(1): 169-174.
引用本文: 张会琴, 叶春松, 阳红, 张弦, 杨帆, 刘广容. 响应面法优化克浅十油田废水的混凝沉淀工艺[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(1): 169-174.
shu
Zhang Huiqin, Ye Chunsong, Yang Hong, Zhang Xian, Yang Fan, Liu Guangrong. Optimization for treatment of oil field wastewater by coagulation sedimentation process using response surface methodology[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(1): 169-174.
Citation: Zhang Huiqin, Ye Chunsong, Yang Hong, Zhang Xian, Yang Fan, Liu Guangrong. Optimization for treatment of oil field wastewater by coagulation sedimentation process using response surface methodology[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(1): 169-174.
shu

响应面法优化克浅十油田废水的混凝沉淀工艺

  • 1.  武汉大学动力与机械学院, 武汉 430072
  • 2.  湖北工业大学化学与环境工程学院,武汉 430068
  • 3.  中船重工环境工程有限公司,武汉 430064
  • 收稿日期:  2012-03-20
基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(208274060)

生物地质与环境地质国家重点实验室开放基金项目(BGEG201101)

摘要: 以克浅十污水处理站原水为研究对象,采用混凝沉淀工艺,探讨优选出的复配混凝剂投加量、助凝剂投加量及静置时间对原水中浊度和总铁去除效果的影响。应用Box-Behnken中心组合实验和响应面分析法,建立混凝剂对处理原水的二次多项式数学模型,确定了混凝沉淀去除原水浊度和总铁的优化工艺参数分别为:复配混凝剂投加量为152.15 mg/L、143.84 mg/L,助凝剂投加量为4.14 mg/L、4.32 mg/L,静置时间为11.77 min、11.22 min。在此工艺条件下回归方程得到的浊度和总铁的去除率预测值与实验值接近,且拟合性良好,误差介于3%~5%之间。通过均值内插法,对比浊度和总铁的多元二次回归方程,推导得出的2组最佳工艺条件均能满足浊度和总铁的去除要求。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (16)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心