高级搜索

中置生物活性炭滤池的选炭

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

李少文, 陆少鸣, 刘金翠, 邵志昌. 中置生物活性炭滤池的选炭[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(11): 3839-3842.
引用本文: 李少文, 陆少鸣, 刘金翠, 邵志昌. 中置生物活性炭滤池的选炭[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(11): 3839-3842.
shu
Li Shaowen, Lu Shaoming, Liu Jincui, Shao Zhichang. Selection of activated carbon for mid-positioning BAC filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(11): 3839-3842.
Citation: Li Shaowen, Lu Shaoming, Liu Jincui, Shao Zhichang. Selection of activated carbon for mid-positioning BAC filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(11): 3839-3842.
shu

中置生物活性炭滤池的选炭

  • 1.

    华南理工大学环境科学与工程学院,广州 510006

  • 基金项目:

    国家"水体污染控制与治理"科技重大专项(2009ZX07423-003)

  • 中图分类号: X703

Selection of activated carbon for mid-positioning BAC filter

  • 1.

    College of Environmental Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006,China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 实验通过对传统臭氧-生物活性炭工艺的调整,采用臭氧-曝气生物活性炭滤池-砂滤池工艺,对比研究了4 mm柱状炭、4 mm破碎炭和1.5 mm柱状炭3种不同类型活性炭用于给水深度处理的运行效果。结果表明,粒径为1.5 mm的柱状炭对有机物和氨氮的去除效果以及出水浊度方面优于其他2种活性炭,但炭滤池水头损失偏大,且不够稳定,适当增加柱状炭的粒径可稳定和降低滤池的水头损失。
    Abstract: Taking a new O3-BAC process, ozone-aerated BAC filter-sand filter, an experiment on the effect of BAC filter with different type of activated carbon was carried out to make a comparison of the treatment effect among the filters with 4 mm broken carbon,4 mm cylindrical carbon and 1.5 mm cylindrical carbon as media respectively. The result shows that all the filters had little effect on removing turbidity, while BAC filter with 1.5 mm cylindrical carbon as filter media had better efficiency of removing organic matters and NH3-N than the others in general, however, the head loss was a little higher. Enlarging the cylindrical carbon diameter properly can lower the head loss and make it more stable.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 王占生,刘文君.微污染水源饮用水处理.北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1999
    [2] 左金龙,崔福义,赵志伟,等.国内外臭氧活性炭工艺在饮用水处理中的应用实例.中国给水排水,2006,22(10):68-72 Zuo Jinlong, Cui Fuyi, Zhao Zhiwei, et al. Application examples of ozone/ activated carbon process to drinking water treatment. China Water & Wastewater,2006,22(10):68-72(in Chinese)
    [3] Chreiber H., Schoenen D., Traunspurgez W. Invezlebrate colonization of granular activated carbon filters. Water Research,1997,31(4):743-748
    [4] 陆少鸣,杨立,陈艺韵,等.高速给水曝气生物滤池预处理微污染原水. 中国给水排水, 2009,25(18):65-70 Lu Shaoming, Yang Li., Chen Yiyun, et al. High-rate UBAF for pretreatment of micro-polluted raw water. China Water & Wastewater,2009, 25(18):65-70(in Chinese)
    [5] 何文杰. 安全饮用水保障技术. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2006
    [6] 郏其庚,罗启云,郑国炉.活性炭的应用.上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2002
    [7] 国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法(第4版).北京:中国环境科学出社,2002
    [8] 林浩添.南洲水厂生物活性炭滤料选型.给水排水, 2005,31(8):30-32 Lin Haotian. Selection of activated carbon for Nanzhou waterworks. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2005, 31(8):30-32(in Chinese)
    [9] 乔铁军,刘晓飞,范洁,等.生物活性炭技术的安全性评价.中国给水排水,2004, 20(2): 31-33 Qiao Tiejun, Liu Xiaofei, Fang Jie, et al. Safety assessment of BAC technology. China Water & Wastewater,2004, 20(2):31-33(in Chinese)
    [10] 李思敏,刘强,秦卫峰,等.上向流曝气生物滤池去除氨氮效果及影响因索分析.中国给水排水,2009, 25(3):102-105 Li Simin, Liu Qiang, Qin Weifeng, et al. The effect of removing NH3-N and influence factors analysis of up-flow BAF. China Water & Wastewater,2009,25 (3):102-105(in Chinese)
    [11] 室外给水设计规范(GB50013-2006),2006 Outdoor Water Supply Design Codes (2006) GB50013. June 1, 2006(in Chinese)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2406
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1359
  • PDF下载数:  2360
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-09-25
  • 刊出日期:  2012-11-09
李少文, 陆少鸣, 刘金翠, 邵志昌. 中置生物活性炭滤池的选炭[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(11): 3839-3842.
引用本文: 李少文, 陆少鸣, 刘金翠, 邵志昌. 中置生物活性炭滤池的选炭[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(11): 3839-3842.
shu
Li Shaowen, Lu Shaoming, Liu Jincui, Shao Zhichang. Selection of activated carbon for mid-positioning BAC filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(11): 3839-3842.
Citation: Li Shaowen, Lu Shaoming, Liu Jincui, Shao Zhichang. Selection of activated carbon for mid-positioning BAC filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(11): 3839-3842.
shu

中置生物活性炭滤池的选炭

  • 1. 华南理工大学环境科学与工程学院,广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:  2011-09-25
基金项目:

国家"水体污染控制与治理"科技重大专项(2009ZX07423-003)

摘要: 实验通过对传统臭氧-生物活性炭工艺的调整,采用臭氧-曝气生物活性炭滤池-砂滤池工艺,对比研究了4 mm柱状炭、4 mm破碎炭和1.5 mm柱状炭3种不同类型活性炭用于给水深度处理的运行效果。结果表明,粒径为1.5 mm的柱状炭对有机物和氨氮的去除效果以及出水浊度方面优于其他2种活性炭,但炭滤池水头损失偏大,且不够稳定,适当增加柱状炭的粒径可稳定和降低滤池的水头损失。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (11)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心