大连近岸海域表层海水中典型人工甜味剂的浓度分布及生态风险评估

岳扬, 李莉, 王炫凯, 王侯宇, 张玉凤, 张倩, 刘鹰, 曲宝成. 大连近岸海域表层海水中典型人工甜味剂的浓度分布及生态风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(4): 451-459. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210923003
引用本文: 岳扬, 李莉, 王炫凯, 王侯宇, 张玉凤, 张倩, 刘鹰, 曲宝成. 大连近岸海域表层海水中典型人工甜味剂的浓度分布及生态风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(4): 451-459. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210923003
Yue Yang, Li Li, Wang Xuankai, Wang Houyu, Zhang Yufeng, Zhang Qian, Liu Ying, Qu Baocheng. Concentration Distribution and Risk Assessment of Typical Artificial Sweeteners in Surface Seawater of Dalian Coastal Area[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(4): 451-459. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210923003
Citation: Yue Yang, Li Li, Wang Xuankai, Wang Houyu, Zhang Yufeng, Zhang Qian, Liu Ying, Qu Baocheng. Concentration Distribution and Risk Assessment of Typical Artificial Sweeteners in Surface Seawater of Dalian Coastal Area[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(4): 451-459. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210923003

大连近岸海域表层海水中典型人工甜味剂的浓度分布及生态风险评估

    作者简介: 岳扬(1996—),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为海水污染评价,E-mail:yylovelife9@163.com
    通讯作者: 曲宝成, E-mail: qubaocheng@dlou.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    国家重点研发计划(2020YFD0900603)

  • 中图分类号: X171.5

Concentration Distribution and Risk Assessment of Typical Artificial Sweeteners in Surface Seawater of Dalian Coastal Area

    Corresponding author: Qu Baocheng, qubaocheng@dlou.edu.cn
  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 人工甜味剂作为一类有机新污染物正日益引起人们的广泛关注。本研究采用固相萃取前处理与高效液相色谱-三重四极杆(HPLC-MS/MS)相结合的方法,测定了大连近岸海域中的8种典型人工甜味剂的浓度,结果表明,大连近岸海域普遍存在人工甜味剂污染,其中三氯蔗糖(SUC)和安赛蜜(ACE)是主要污染物,污染水平分别为32~766 ng·L-1和103~557 ng·L-1。生态风险评估结果表明,现阶段大连近岸海域的人工甜味剂污染不太可能对水生生物造成生态风险。鉴于人工甜味剂在大连近岸海域高频检出,有必要进行长期监测以评估其风险水平。
  • 加载中
  • Scheurer M, Brauch H J, Lange F T. Analysis and occurrence of seven artificial sweeteners in German waste water and surface water and in soil aquifer treatment (SAT)[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2009, 394(6):1585-1594
    中国食品添加剂编辑部. 中国食品添加剂和配料协会召开甜味剂专业委员会和功能糖配料专业委员会2018年行业年会[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2018(11):46-47 Editorial of China Food Additives. 2018

    CFAA Sweeteners Committee & Functional Sugar Ingredients Committee Annual Conference was held[J]. China Food Additives, 2018(11):46-47(in Chinese)

    Zeynep F, Sifa T. Determination of the effects of some artificial sweeteners on human peripheral lymphocytes using the comet assay[J]. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, 2014, 6(8):147-153
    Soffritti M, Belpoggi F, Manservigi M, et al. Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice[J]. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 2010, 53(12):1197-1206
    Schiffman S S, Rother K I. Sucralose, A synthetic organochlorine sweetener:Overview of biological issues[J]. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 2013, 16(7):399-451
    Gallus S, Scotti L, Negri E, et al. Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk in a network of case-control studies[J]. Annals of Oncology, 2007, 18(1):40-44
    Praveena S M, Cheema M S, Guo H R. Non-nutritive artificial sweeteners as an emerging contaminant in environment:A global review and risks perspectives[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 170:699-707
    Brorstrm-Lundén E, Svenson A, Viktor T, et al. Sucralose in Surface Waters and STP Samples[M]//Measurements of Sucralose in the Swedish Screening Program 2007-PART I. Stockholm:Stockholm Report, 2008:1-24
    Subedi B, Kannan K. Fate of artificial sweeteners in wastewater treatment plants in New York State, USA[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(23):13668-13674
    Gan Z W, Sun H W, Feng B T, et al. Occurrence of seven artificial sweeteners in the aquatic environment and precipitation of Tianjin, China[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47(14):4928-4937
    Loos R, Gawlik B M, Boettcher K, et al. Sucralose screening in European surface waters using a solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2009, 1216(7):1126-1131
    Morlock G E, Schuele L, Grashorn S. Development of a quantitative high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method for sucralose in sewage effluent, surface water, and drinking water[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2011, 1218(19):2745-2753
    Mead R N, Morgan J B, Avery G B Jr, et al. Occurrence of the artificial sweetener sucralose in coastal and marine waters of the United States[J]. Marine Chemistry, 2009, 116(1-4):13-17
    Cantwell M G, Katz D R, Sullivan J C, et al. Spatial patterns of pharmaceuticals and wastewater tracers in the Hudson River Estuary[J]. Water Research, 2018, 137:335-343
    Brumovský M, Bečanová J, Kohoutek J, et al. Exploring the occurrence and distribution of contaminants of emerging concern through unmanned sampling from ships of opportunity in the North Sea[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 2016, 162:47-56
    Loos R, Tavazzi S, Paracchini B, et al. Analysis of polar organic contaminants in surface water of the northern Adriatic Sea by solid-phase extraction followed by ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography-QTRAP® MS using a hybrid triple-quadrupole linear ion trap instrument[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2013, 405(18):5875-5885
    Baena-Nogueras R M, Traverso-Soto J M, Biel-Maeso M, et al. Sources and trends of artificial sweeteners in coastal waters in the bay of Cadiz (NE Atlantic)[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 135:607-616
    Xie H J, Chen J W, Huang Y, et al. Screening of 484 trace organic contaminants in coastal waters around the Liaodong Peninsula, China:Occurrence, distribution, and ecological risk[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 267:115436
    Sang Z Y, Jiang Y N, Tsoi Y K, et al. Evaluating the environmental impact of artificial sweeteners:A study of their distributions, photodegradation and toxicities[J]. Water Research, 2014, 52:260-274
    Yang Y Y, Zhao J L, Liu Y S, et al. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and artificial sweeteners (ASs) in surface and ground waters and their application as indication of wastewater contamination[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 616-617:816-823
    Zhang Y X, Chen H Y, Jing L J, et al. Ecotoxicological risk assessment and source apportionment of antibiotics in the waters and sediments of a peri-urban river[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 731:139128
    Zhang R J, Tang J H, Li J, et al. Antibiotics in the offshore waters of the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea in China:Occurrence, distribution and ecological risks[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2013, 174:71-77
    Zhong M Y, Tang J H, Guo X Y, et al. Occurrence and spatial distribution of organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in the Bohai, Yellow and East China Seas[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 741:140434
    Zhang Z M, Zhang H H, Zou Y W, et al. Distribution and ecotoxicological state of phthalate esters in the sea-surface microlayer, seawater and sediment of the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 240:235-247
    Wiklund A K, Breitholtz M, Bengtsson B E, et al. Sucralose:An ecotoxicological challenger?[J]. Chemosphere, 2012, 86(1):50-55
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1709
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1709
  • PDF下载数:  60
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-09-23
岳扬, 李莉, 王炫凯, 王侯宇, 张玉凤, 张倩, 刘鹰, 曲宝成. 大连近岸海域表层海水中典型人工甜味剂的浓度分布及生态风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(4): 451-459. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210923003
引用本文: 岳扬, 李莉, 王炫凯, 王侯宇, 张玉凤, 张倩, 刘鹰, 曲宝成. 大连近岸海域表层海水中典型人工甜味剂的浓度分布及生态风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(4): 451-459. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210923003
Yue Yang, Li Li, Wang Xuankai, Wang Houyu, Zhang Yufeng, Zhang Qian, Liu Ying, Qu Baocheng. Concentration Distribution and Risk Assessment of Typical Artificial Sweeteners in Surface Seawater of Dalian Coastal Area[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(4): 451-459. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210923003
Citation: Yue Yang, Li Li, Wang Xuankai, Wang Houyu, Zhang Yufeng, Zhang Qian, Liu Ying, Qu Baocheng. Concentration Distribution and Risk Assessment of Typical Artificial Sweeteners in Surface Seawater of Dalian Coastal Area[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(4): 451-459. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210923003

大连近岸海域表层海水中典型人工甜味剂的浓度分布及生态风险评估

    通讯作者: 曲宝成, E-mail: qubaocheng@dlou.edu.cn
    作者简介: 岳扬(1996—),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为海水污染评价,E-mail:yylovelife9@163.com
  • 1. 设施渔业教育部重点实验室(大连海洋大学), 大连 116023;
  • 2. 大连市检验检测认证技术服务中心, 大连 116023
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2020YFD0900603)

摘要: 人工甜味剂作为一类有机新污染物正日益引起人们的广泛关注。本研究采用固相萃取前处理与高效液相色谱-三重四极杆(HPLC-MS/MS)相结合的方法,测定了大连近岸海域中的8种典型人工甜味剂的浓度,结果表明,大连近岸海域普遍存在人工甜味剂污染,其中三氯蔗糖(SUC)和安赛蜜(ACE)是主要污染物,污染水平分别为32~766 ng·L-1和103~557 ng·L-1。生态风险评估结果表明,现阶段大连近岸海域的人工甜味剂污染不太可能对水生生物造成生态风险。鉴于人工甜味剂在大连近岸海域高频检出,有必要进行长期监测以评估其风险水平。

English Abstract

参考文献 (25)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回