16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估

张艳峰, 王会利. 16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2020, 15(6): 271-278. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191112001
引用本文: 张艳峰, 王会利. 16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2020, 15(6): 271-278. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191112001
Zhang Yanfeng, Wang Huili. Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of 16 Pesticide Formulations to Apis mellifera[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2020, 15(6): 271-278. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191112001
Citation: Zhang Yanfeng, Wang Huili. Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of 16 Pesticide Formulations to Apis mellifera[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2020, 15(6): 271-278. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191112001

16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估

    作者简介: 张艳峰(1984-),男,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为农药毒理与农药分析,E-mail:yfzhang@rcees.ac.cn
    通讯作者: 王会利, E-mail: huiliwang@rcees.ac.cn
  • 中图分类号: X171.5

Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of 16 Pesticide Formulations to Apis mellifera

    Corresponding author: Wang Huili, huiliwang@rcees.ac.cn
  • 摘要: 为评价常用化学农药对意大利蜜蜂的毒害作用,采用饲喂法和微量点滴法分别测定了16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂成年工蜂的急性经口毒性和急性接触毒性,并结合田间推荐施用量计算风险商值,进行了初级风险评估。结果表明,供试8种杀虫剂均为高毒,其中,除10%高效氯氰菊酯水乳剂风险商值为0.89,<1外,其余7种制剂风险商值均>1,风险不可接受。除草剂中,45%莎稗磷乳油为中毒,急性经口和急性接触的48 h半致死剂量(48 h-LD50)分别为5.90 μg a.i.·蜂-1和5.42 μg a.i.·蜂-1,风险商值>1,风险不可接受。其余4种除草剂和3种杀菌剂均为低毒,风险商值均<1,风险可接受。15%高效氯氟氰菊酯·噻虫嗪悬浮剂和10%高效氯氟氰菊酯·噻虫胺悬浮剂2种混配制剂相比于单剂,对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性和风险均升高。建议对高风险制剂进一步开展高级风险评估或采取错开作物花期施用等规避措施降低对蜜蜂的风险。
  • 加载中
  • 于彩虹, 李春燕, 林荣华, 等. 农药对陆生生物的生态毒性及风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2015, 10(6):21-28

    Yu C H, Li C Y, Lin R H, et al. Eco-toxicity and risk assessment of pesticide on terrestrial organisms[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2015, 10(6):21-28(in Chinese)

    Xu H Q, Xue M, Zhao H P, et al. Analysis and evaluation of eight herbicides toxicity and sensitivity against two Trichogramma spp.[J]. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 2013, 11(3):855-858
    卜元卿, 孔源, 智勇, 等. 化学农药对环境的污染及其防控对策建议[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(2):19-25

    Bu Y Q, Kong Y, Zhi Y, et al. Pollution of chemical pesticides on environment and suggestion for prevention and control countermeasures[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014, 16(2):19-25(in Chinese)

    李志勇, 王志, 牛庆生, 等. 农药与蜜蜂生态安全[J]. 中国蜂业, 2014, 65(2):26-27
    Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?[J]. Oikos, 2011, 120(3):321-326
    罗其花, 彭文君, 安建东, 等. 蜂群衰竭失调病(CCD)致病因子分析及我国的应对措施[J]. 昆虫知识, 2008, 45(6):991-995

    Luo Q H, Peng W J, An J D, et al. The potential causes of Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) and its countermeasures in China[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology, 2008, 45(6):991-995(in Chinese)

    VanEngelsdorp D, Meixner M D. A historical review of managed honey bee populations in Europe and the United States and the factors that may affect them[J]. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2010, 103:S80-S95
    单蕾. 欧盟委员会颁布新烟碱类杀虫剂限令[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2013, 34(10):9
    袁锐, 李丽莉, 李超, 等. 六种新烟碱类杀虫剂对凹唇壁蜂的毒性及风险评估[J]. 昆虫学报, 2018, 61(8):950-956

    Yuan R, Li L L, Li C, et al. Toxicity and hazard assessment of six neonicotinoid insecticides on Osmia excavata (Hymenoptera:Megachilidae)[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2018, 61(8):950-956(in Chinese)

    Claudianos C, Ranson H, Johnson R M, et al. A deficit of detoxification enzymes:Pesticide sensitivity and environmental response in the honeybee[J]. Insect Molecular Biology, 2006, 15(5):615-636
    李少南. 农药生态毒理学概念及方法学探讨[J]. 农药学学报, 2014, 16(4):375-386

    Li S N. Pesticide ecotoxicology:Concepts and methodology[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2014, 16(4):375-386(in Chinese)

    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则第10部分:蜜蜂急性毒性试验:GB/T 31270.10-2014[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2015
    中华人民共和国农业部. 农药登记环境风险评估指南第4部分:蜜蜂:NY/T 2882.4-2016[S]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2016
    Maienfisch P, Huerlimann H, Rindlisbacher A, et al. The discovery of thiamethoxam:A second-generation neonicotinoid[J]. Pest Management Science, 2001, 57(2):165-176
    Torres J B, Ruberson J R. Toxicity of thiamethoxam and imidacloprid to Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas) (Heteroptera:Pentatomidae) nymphs associated to aphid and whitefly control in cotton[J]. Neotropical Entomology, 2004, 33(1) DOI:10.1590/s1519-566x2004000100017
    吴迟, 姜辉, 王长宾, 等. 四种新烟碱类杀虫剂对蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估[J]. 农药学学报, 2015, 17(4):486-491

    Wu C, Jiang H, Wang C B, et al. Acute toxicity and first tier risk assessment of four neonicotinoid insecticides to honeybees[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2015, 17(4):486-491(in Chinese)

    谭丽超, 程燕, 朱昱璇, 等. 新烟碱类杀虫剂呋虫胺对意大利蜜蜂的安全性评价[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2017, 12(4):227-233

    Tan L C, Cheng Y, Zhu Y X, et al. Safety evaluation of nicotinic insecticide dinotefuran on honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2017, 12(4):227-233(in Chinese)

    苍涛, 王彦华, 吴长兴, 等. 新烟碱类杀虫剂对蜜蜂的急性毒性及风险评价[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2017, 12(4):285-292

    Cang T, Wang Y H, Wu C X, et al. Acute toxicity and risk assessment of neonicotinoid insecticides to honeybees (Apis mellifera L.)[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2017, 12(4):285-292(in Chinese)

    周凌云, 张莉, 魏芸芸. 4种拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂对蜜蜂的毒性和安全性评价[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2014, 30(6):641-643

    Zhou L Y, Zhang L, Wei Y Y. Study of toxicity and safety evaluation on four pyrethroid insecticides to honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2014, 30(6):641-643(in Chinese)

    瞿唯钢, 杨淞霖, 王会利, 等. 3种农药及其复配剂对意大利工蜂的急性经口毒性[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2016, 11(4):287-290

    Qu W G, Yang S L, Wang H L, et al. Toxicity of thiamethoxam, fludioxonil, mefenoxam and their compounds to Apis mellifera L.[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2016, 11(4):287-290(in Chinese)

    何杏, 王玉洁, 刘俊峰, 等. 4种农药对海南中蜂的急性毒性及风险评估[J]. 农药, 2015, 54(12):911-914

    ,917 He X, Wang Y J, Liu J F, et al. Acute toxicity and risk assessment of four pesticides on Apis cerana hainana[J]. Agrochemicals, 2015, 54(12):911-914,917(in Chinese)

    程沈航, 薛明明, 隋婧怡, 等. 7种农药对管氏肿腿蜂的毒性及初级风险评价[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2017, 12(4):270-278

    Cheng S H, Xue M M, Sui J Y, et al. Toxicity and risk assessment of seven pesticides to parasitic wasp (Scleroderma guani)[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2017, 12(4):270-278(in Chinese)

    高越, 张润祥, 王振, 等. 不同农药单剂及混配微乳剂的环境毒性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(12):295-300

    Gao Y, Zhang R X, Wang Z, et al. Environmental toxicity of several different pesticides single or mixed micro-emulsion[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(12):295-300(in Chinese)

    游泳, 应碧华, 赖露芳, 等. 4种烟嘧磺隆多元复配除草剂对意大利蜜蜂和玉米螟赤眼蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2018, 13(6):298-306

    You Y, Ying B H, Lai L F, et al. The acute toxicity and risk assessment of four multi-combination nicosulfuron to Apis mellifera and Trichogramma ostriniae[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2018, 13(6):298-306(in Chinese)

    陈朗, 姜辉, 贾俊超, 等. 农药混配制剂环境风险评估现状与展望[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2017, 12(4):15-24

    Chen L, Jiang H, Jia J C, et al. Environmental risk assessment for mixed pesticide products:Current situation and prospects[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2017, 12(4):15-24(in Chinese)

    廖建华, 程燕, 卜元卿, 等. 中国主要蜜源作物上登记的农药品种及其中杀虫剂对蜜蜂的初级风险评估[J]. 农药学学报, 2018, 20(1):100-109

    Liao J H, Cheng Y, Bu Y Q, et al. Review of the pesticides registered on major nectar crops in China and the primary risk assessment of the insecticides to honey bees[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2018, 20(1):100-109(in Chinese)

    梁秀美, 王祥云, 汪志威, 等. 茶园花期用药后蜂花粉中吡虫啉及其代谢物残留的蜜蜂风险评估[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(6):1102-1107

    Liang X M, Wang X Y, Wang Z W, et al. Residues of imidacloprid and its metabolites in pollen, and exposure assessment for honey bees after spray application during the flowering period of tea[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018, 37(6):1102-1107(in Chinese)

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3225
  • HTML全文浏览数:  3225
  • PDF下载数:  61
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-11-12
张艳峰, 王会利. 16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2020, 15(6): 271-278. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191112001
引用本文: 张艳峰, 王会利. 16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2020, 15(6): 271-278. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191112001
Zhang Yanfeng, Wang Huili. Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of 16 Pesticide Formulations to Apis mellifera[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2020, 15(6): 271-278. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191112001
Citation: Zhang Yanfeng, Wang Huili. Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of 16 Pesticide Formulations to Apis mellifera[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2020, 15(6): 271-278. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20191112001

16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估

    通讯作者: 王会利, E-mail: huiliwang@rcees.ac.cn
    作者简介: 张艳峰(1984-),男,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为农药毒理与农药分析,E-mail:yfzhang@rcees.ac.cn
  • 中国科学院生态环境研究中心环境生物技术重点实验室, 北京 100085

摘要: 为评价常用化学农药对意大利蜜蜂的毒害作用,采用饲喂法和微量点滴法分别测定了16种农药制剂对意大利蜜蜂成年工蜂的急性经口毒性和急性接触毒性,并结合田间推荐施用量计算风险商值,进行了初级风险评估。结果表明,供试8种杀虫剂均为高毒,其中,除10%高效氯氰菊酯水乳剂风险商值为0.89,<1外,其余7种制剂风险商值均>1,风险不可接受。除草剂中,45%莎稗磷乳油为中毒,急性经口和急性接触的48 h半致死剂量(48 h-LD50)分别为5.90 μg a.i.·蜂-1和5.42 μg a.i.·蜂-1,风险商值>1,风险不可接受。其余4种除草剂和3种杀菌剂均为低毒,风险商值均<1,风险可接受。15%高效氯氟氰菊酯·噻虫嗪悬浮剂和10%高效氯氟氰菊酯·噻虫胺悬浮剂2种混配制剂相比于单剂,对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性和风险均升高。建议对高风险制剂进一步开展高级风险评估或采取错开作物花期施用等规避措施降低对蜜蜂的风险。

English Abstract

参考文献 (27)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回