用于水体原位脱氮除磷的新型曝气浮岛填料

常玉龙, 朱洪涛, 孙德智, 张立秋. 用于水体原位脱氮除磷的新型曝气浮岛填料[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(4): 2007-2015. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201602080
引用本文: 常玉龙, 朱洪涛, 孙德智, 张立秋. 用于水体原位脱氮除磷的新型曝气浮岛填料[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(4): 2007-2015. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201602080
CHANG Yulong, ZHU Hongtao, SUN Dezhi, ZHANG Liqiu. Performance of media selected for a novel enhanced floating island to remediate eutrophicated river in situ[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 2007-2015. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201602080
Citation: CHANG Yulong, ZHU Hongtao, SUN Dezhi, ZHANG Liqiu. Performance of media selected for a novel enhanced floating island to remediate eutrophicated river in situ[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 2007-2015. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201602080

用于水体原位脱氮除磷的新型曝气浮岛填料

  • 基金项目:
  • 中图分类号: X522

Performance of media selected for a novel enhanced floating island to remediate eutrophicated river in situ

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 针对宜兴城镇化新区河流夏季富营养化的特点,拟采用一种不依赖于植物的新型强化曝气浮岛对该类水体进行原位处理。为强化浮岛筛选合适的填料,研究了3种填料在模拟富营养化自然状态下的挂膜性能,以及对模拟富营养化河流水质的净化效果。结果显示,空心球、鲍尔环和K3填料的终期挂膜量分别为0.6、1.5和2.2 g·L-1;空心球和K3填料的净化效果较好,综合考虑工艺的经济性要求,确定空心球作为该工艺的有机类型填料。在此基础上,进一步研究了水质、水温和曝气强度等参数对空心球挂膜的影响。污染物负荷越大,温度越高,其挂膜速度越快,但在实验范围内的温度对最终挂膜量并没有影响。保持较高的溶解氧浓度有利于COD、氨氮和TP的去除,但5 mg·L-1以上的溶解氧浓度不利于总氮的去除,溶解氧浓度为3 mg·L-1时对总氮去除率最高,对COD、氨氮、TN和TP的去除率分别为61.10%、81.45%、58.60%和31.62%。与空心球相比,包括沸石钢渣的组合填料对COD、氨氮、TN和TP的去除速率分别提高了13.01%、51%、86.36%和53.85%。
  • 加载中
  • [1] NAKAMURA K, SHIMATANI Y. Water purification and environmental enhancement by the floating wetland[C]//Proceedings of the 6th IAWQ Asia-Pacific Regional Conference. Korea: IAWQ, 1997: 888-895
    [2] 王劼, 刘阳, 王泽民, 等. 人工浮岛技术应用前景[J]. 环境保护科学, 2008, 34(5): 23-25
    [3] 林雪兵, 王培风. 人工浮岛在富营养化水体修复中的应用[J]. 浙江水利水电专科学校学报, 2010, 22(4): 27-29
    [4] 晁雷, 刘馨, 胡成, 等. 人工浮岛技术在北方地区水质改善中的研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012 (2): 135-138
    [5] ZHANG Chongbang, LIU Wenli, PAN Xiaocui, et al. Comparison of effects of plant and biofilm bacterial community parameters on removal performances of pollutants in floating island systems[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 73: 58-63
    [6] STEWART F M, MULHOLLAND T, CUNNINGHAM A B, et al. Floating islands as an alternative to constructed wetlands for treatment of excess nutrients from agricultural and municipal wastes-results of laboratory-scale tests[J]. Land Contamination & Reclamation, 2008, 16(1): 25-33
    [7] CALHEIROS C S C, RANGEL A O S S, CASTRO P M L. Constructed wetland systems vegetated with different plants applied to the treatment of tannery wastewater[J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(8): 1790-1798
    [8] KLOMJEK P, NITISORAVUT S. Constructed treatment wetland: A study of eight plant species under saline conditions[J]. Chemosphere, 2005, 58(5): 585-593
    [9] WANG C Y, SAMPLE D J, BELL C. Vegetation effects on floating treatment wetland nutrient removal and harvesting strategies in urban stormwater ponds[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 499: 384-393
    [10] LADISLAS S, GÉRENTE C, CHAZARENC F, et al. Floating treatment wetlands for heavy metal removal in highway stormwater ponds[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 80: 85-91
    [11] 张玲玲, 李昆, 李兆华. 无纺布人工浮岛在改善富营养化水体水质中的应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2012, 29(9): 18-21
    [12] 李志鸿, 王明玉. 复合介质人工浮岛对含铜废水净化效果试验研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011, 34(2): 129-135
    [13] LU H L, KU C R, CHANG Y H. Water quality improvement with artificial floating islands[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 74: 371-375
    [14] CHANG Y H, WU Bingyu, LAI Chaofeng. The effect of a green energy landscape fountain on water quality improvement[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 73: 201-208
    [15] 路远, 孙力平, 衣雪松, 等. 生物膜法水处理用悬浮填料的筛选[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2008, 39(5): 69-72
    [16] 董滨, 金波, 何群彪, 等. 关于污水处理领域悬浮填料产品的探讨[J]. 净水技术, 2008, 27(3): 57-60
    [17] 金冬霞, 田刚, 施汉昌. 悬浮填料的选取及其性能试验研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2002, 22(3): 333-337
    [18] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法.4版[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002
    [19] CAO Y S, ALAERTS G J. Influence of reactor type and shear stress on aerobic biofilm morphology, population and kinetics[J]. Water Research, 1995, 29(1): 107-118
    [20] 郑作添. 球型组合片悬浮填料的制备及其在污水处理中的应用[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2006: 46
    [21] HE Shengbing, XUE Gang, WANG Baozhen. Factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and de-nitrification (SND) and its kinetics model in membrane bioreactor[J]. Journal of Hazardous Material, 2009, 168(2/3): 704-710
    [22] CAO Wenping, ZHANG Yanqiu. Removal of nitrogen (N) from hypereutrophic waters by ecological floating beds (EFBs) with various substrates[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 62: 148-152
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1812
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1395
  • PDF下载数:  411
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-04-01
  • 刊出日期:  2017-04-22
常玉龙, 朱洪涛, 孙德智, 张立秋. 用于水体原位脱氮除磷的新型曝气浮岛填料[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(4): 2007-2015. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201602080
引用本文: 常玉龙, 朱洪涛, 孙德智, 张立秋. 用于水体原位脱氮除磷的新型曝气浮岛填料[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(4): 2007-2015. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201602080
CHANG Yulong, ZHU Hongtao, SUN Dezhi, ZHANG Liqiu. Performance of media selected for a novel enhanced floating island to remediate eutrophicated river in situ[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 2007-2015. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201602080
Citation: CHANG Yulong, ZHU Hongtao, SUN Dezhi, ZHANG Liqiu. Performance of media selected for a novel enhanced floating island to remediate eutrophicated river in situ[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 2007-2015. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201602080

用于水体原位脱氮除磷的新型曝气浮岛填料

  • 1. 北京林业大学环境科学与工程学院, 北京 100083
基金项目:

摘要: 针对宜兴城镇化新区河流夏季富营养化的特点,拟采用一种不依赖于植物的新型强化曝气浮岛对该类水体进行原位处理。为强化浮岛筛选合适的填料,研究了3种填料在模拟富营养化自然状态下的挂膜性能,以及对模拟富营养化河流水质的净化效果。结果显示,空心球、鲍尔环和K3填料的终期挂膜量分别为0.6、1.5和2.2 g·L-1;空心球和K3填料的净化效果较好,综合考虑工艺的经济性要求,确定空心球作为该工艺的有机类型填料。在此基础上,进一步研究了水质、水温和曝气强度等参数对空心球挂膜的影响。污染物负荷越大,温度越高,其挂膜速度越快,但在实验范围内的温度对最终挂膜量并没有影响。保持较高的溶解氧浓度有利于COD、氨氮和TP的去除,但5 mg·L-1以上的溶解氧浓度不利于总氮的去除,溶解氧浓度为3 mg·L-1时对总氮去除率最高,对COD、氨氮、TN和TP的去除率分别为61.10%、81.45%、58.60%和31.62%。与空心球相比,包括沸石钢渣的组合填料对COD、氨氮、TN和TP的去除速率分别提高了13.01%、51%、86.36%和53.85%。

English Abstract

参考文献 (22)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回