美国污染地块风险管控的发展历程、演变特征及启示

焦文涛; 方引青; 李绍华; 岳勇; 丁宁; 秦之瑞; 张红振

doi:10.12030/j.cjee.202009186

[1]

NAIDU R, WONG M H, NATHANAIL P. Bioavailability-the underlying basis for risk-based land management[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22: 8775-8778. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4295-z

[2]

CUNDY A B, BARDOS R P, CHURCH A, et al. Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for “gentle” remediation approaches: The European context[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 129: 283-291.

[3]

BLUM E D. Love Canal Revisited[M]. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 2008: 22.

[4]

VISCUSI J. How costly is "clean"? An analysis of the benefits and costs of superfund site remediations[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management1999, 18(1): 2-27.

[5]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The comprehensive environmental esponse, compensation, and liability act (CERCLA) [EB/OL]. [2014-07-21]. Washington, DC: USEPA-http:∥www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/cercla.htm.

[6]

SHERK G. Reauthorization of CERCLA and the redevelopment of brownfields: Who will pay the orphan’s share?[J]. Environmental Engineering and Policy, 2001, 2(4): 171-179. doi: 10.1007/s100220000031

[7]

贾峰. 美国超级基金法研究: 历史遗留污染问题的美国解决之道[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2015.

[8]

HEDEMAN W N, SHORB P E, MCLEAN C A. The superfund amendments and reauthorization act of 1986: Statutory provisions and EPA implementation[J]. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 1987, 4(2): 193-210. doi: 10.1089/hwm.1987.4.193

[9]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Superfund remedy report(1^st edition)[EB/OL]. [2020-09-01]. 1991. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/asr_1stedition.pdf.

[10]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Superfund remedy report(7^th edition)[EB/OL]. [2020-09-01]. 1995. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/asr7theditionpdf.

[11]

CARTER K M. Superfund amendments and reauthorization act of 1986: Limiting judicial review to the administrtive record in cost recovery actions by the EPA[J]. Columbia Law Review, 1988, 74: 1152.

[12]

PERKINS S, SNOWHITE L. The CERCLA five-year review process: Lessons learned at Rocky Mountain Arsenal[J]. Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, 2001, 12(3): 99-107. doi: 10.1002/ffej.1021

[13]

王兴润, 颜湘华. 美国超级基金制度与国内污染地块评估案例[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2014.

[14]

牛静, 李鹏, 黄海, 等. 美国超级基金5年回顾政策对我国污染场地风险管理的启示[J]. 中国环境管理, 2015, 7(2): 68-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6252.2015.02.014

[15]

DEEB R, HAWLEY E, KELL L, et al. Alternative endpoints and approaches selected for the remediation of contaminated groundwater at complex sites[J]. Journal of Immunological Methods, 2011, 64(3): 269-281.

[16]

李云祯, 董荐, 刘姝媛, 等. 基于风险管控思路的土壤污染防治研究与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(6): 1075-1084.

[17]

CORNOR J A, MCHUGH T E. Impact of risk-based corrective action (RBCA) on State LUST Corrective Action Programs[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 2002, 8(3): 573-589. doi: 10.1080/10807030290879835

[18]

CORNOR J A. Study shows positive impact of ASTM risk-based corrective action (RBCA) standard[J]. ASTM Standardization News, 2000, 28: 34-39.

[19]

CHANG S H, KUO C Y, WANG J W, et al. Comparison of RBCA and CalTOX for setting risk-based cleanup levels based on inhalation exposure[J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 56(4): 359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.01.006

[20]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). SSG user’s guide and technical background document[S]. EPA/540/R-96/018, 1996.

[21]

龚宇阳. 国际经验综述: 污染地块管理政策与法规框架[R]. 华盛顿: 世界银行, 2010.

[22]

耿春女, 李小平, 罗启仕, 等. 污染场地土壤修复导则分析及启示[J]. 上海环境科学, 2009, 28(2): 66-71.

[23]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels[R]. Washington D C: USEPA, 2003.

[24]

卢军, 伍斌, 谷庆宝. 美国污染场地管理历程及对中国的启示: 基于风险的可持续管理[J]. 环境保护, 2017, 45(24): 65-70.

[25]

SENIER L, HUDSON B, FORT S, et al. Brown superfund basic research program: A multistakeholder partnership addresses real-world problems in contaminated communities[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(13): 4655-4662.

[26]

INOUE Y, KATAYAMAK A. Two-scale evaluation of remediation technologies for a contaminated site by applying economic input-output life cycle assessment: Risk-cost, risk-energy consumption and risk-CO₂ emission[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192(3): 1234-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.029

[27]

BRAUN A B, TRENTIN A W, VISENTIN C, et al. Sustainable remediation through the risk management perspective and stakeholder Involvement: A systematic and bibliometric view of the literature[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019, 255: 113-221.

[28]

RAHM D. Superfund and the policies of US hazardous waste policy[J]. Environmental Politics, 1998, 7(4): 75-91. doi: 10.1080/09644019808414423

[29]

罗思东. 美国城市的棕色地块及其治理[J]. 城市问题, 2002(6): 64-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2031.2002.06.018

[30]

LOLLAND K S, LEWIS R E, TIPTON K. Framework for integrating sustainability into remediation projects[J]. Remediation Journal, 2011, 21(3): 7-38. doi: 10.1002/rem.20288

[31]

FAVARA P J, KRIEGER T M, BOUGHTON B. Guidance for performing footprint analyses and life-cycle assessments for the remediation industry[J]. Remediation Journal, 2011, 21(3): 39-79. doi: 10.1002/rem.20289

[32]

BUTLER P B, LARSEN-HALLOCK L, LEWIS R, et al. Metrics for integrating sustainability evaluations into remediation projects[J]. Remediation Journal, 2011, 21(3): 81-87. doi: 10.1002/rem.20290

[33]

侯德义, 李广贺. 污染土壤绿色可持续修复的内涵与发展方向分析[J]. 环境保护, 2016, 44(20): 16-19.

[34]

MARTINO L E, DONA C L, DICERBO J, et al. Green and sustainable remediation practices in Federal Agency cleanup programs[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(21): 1407. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-6219-8

[35]

KUPPUSAMY S, VENKATESWARLU K, MEGHARAJ M, et al. Risk-based remediation of polluted sites: A critical perspective[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 186: 607-615. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.043

[36]

O'CONNOR D, HOU D Y. Targeting cleanups towards a more sustainable future[J]. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 2018, 20(2): 266-269.

[37]

BRAUN A B, TRENTIN A W, VISENTIN C, et al. Relevance of sustainable remediation to contaminated sites manage in developed and developing countries: Case of Brazil[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 94: 104533. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104533

[38]

PENG Y, LIU Y, DAI J, et al. A sustainable strategy for remediation of oily sewage: Clean and safe[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 240: 116592. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116592

[39]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Superfund remedy report (fifth edition)[EB/OL]. [2020-09-01]. 1993. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/asr_5thedition.pdf.

[40]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Superfund remedy report(fifteenth edition)[EB/OL]. [2020-09-01]. 2017. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-09/documents/100000349.pdf.

[41]

SCOW K M, HICKS K A. Natural attenuation and enhanced bioremediation of organic contaminants in groundwater[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2005, 16(3): 246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.03.009

[42]

National Research Council. Environmental cleanup at Navy facilities: Adaptive site management[EB/OL]. [2020-09-01]. http://www.nap.edu.

[43]

Environmental Security Technology Certifification Program(ESTCP). Assessing alternative endpoints for groundwater remediation of contaminated sites. Project ER-200832 final report[R]. 2010.

[44]

Ohio EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Urban setting designation[EB/OL]. [2020-09-01]. 2009. www.epa.state.oh.us/portals/30/vap/docs/fact8.pdf.

[45]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Summary of key existing epa cercla policies for groundwater restoration. OSWER Directive 9283.1-33[R]. 2009.

[46]

Environmental Security Technology Certifification Program (ESTCP). Final report, assessing alternative endpoints for groundwater remediation at contaminated sites. ESTCP Project ER-200832[R]. 2011.

[47]

HADLEY P W, ARULANANTHAM R, GANDHI D. California's low threat luft site closure policy: Looking forward[J]. Remediation Journal, 2015, 25(2): 9-33. doi: 10.1002/rem.21421

[48]

容跃. 美国污染场地清理的风险评估简介及政策制定[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(4): 1726-1732.

[49]

PRICE J, SPRENG C, HAWLEY E L, et al. Remediation management of complex sites using an adaptive site management approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 204: 738-747.

[50]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). National strategy to expand superfund optimization practices from site assessment to site completion[EB/OL]. [2020-09-01]. 2012. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100K17Y.PDF.

[51]

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Emergency planning and community Right-to-Know Act[EB/OL]. [2020-09-01]. 2002. http://scidiv.bellevuecollege.edu/gj/ENVS100/ENVS100-W11/EPCRA.pdf.

[52]

FASEY A, BREAKWELL G M. Risk communication in the workplace[J]. Journal of Risk Research, 2001, 4(4): 307-308. doi: 10.1080/13669870110062703a