不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露及其影响因素

李友平, 范忠雨, 李坤, 吴大磊. 不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露及其影响因素[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(8): 1408-1416. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2015.08.2015012610
引用本文: 李友平, 范忠雨, 李坤, 吴大磊. 不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露及其影响因素[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(8): 1408-1416. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2015.08.2015012610
LI Youping, FAN Zhongyu, LI Kun, WU Dalei. Commuter exposure to PM2.5 and its influencing factors in different commuting modes[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2015, 34(8): 1408-1416. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2015.08.2015012610
Citation: LI Youping, FAN Zhongyu, LI Kun, WU Dalei. Commuter exposure to PM2.5 and its influencing factors in different commuting modes[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2015, 34(8): 1408-1416. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2015.08.2015012610

不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露及其影响因素

  • 基金项目:

    四川省大学生创新训练计划项目(201310638042)

    四川省教育厅项目(13ZB0011)

    南充市科技局项目(13A0071)

    化学合成与污染控制四川省重点实验室项目(CSPC2014-4-2)

    四川省科技厅项目(2015JY0094).

Commuter exposure to PM2.5 and its influencing factors in different commuting modes

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 于2014年4月在南充市城区选择一条固定线路,使用数字直读式颗粒物测定仪连续14 d对自行车、公交车、私家车、摩托车、出租车和步行等6种出行方式PM2.5个体暴露浓度进行监测;获取采样期间的气象数据和大气环境PM2.5浓度数据,以了解不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露水平及其影响因素.结果表明,不同出行方式中PM2.5个体暴露浓度最高和最低的分别为私家车(51.2±29.2) μg·m-3和出租车(40.2±29.8) μg·m-3;在出行高峰期和工作日,PM2.5个体暴露浓度分别高于非出行高峰期和周末.计入个体暴露时间和呼吸率,最高和最低PM2.5个体暴露量分别为步行(20.9±17.9) μg和出租车(2.8±2.1) μg.应用相关性分析和线性回归分析得出,降雨和风速有利于PM2.5个体暴露浓度降低;大气环境PM2.5浓度对个体暴露量有正相关影响.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Graff D W,Cascio W E,Rappold A,et al. Exposure to concentrated coarse air pollution particles causes mild cardiopulmonary effects in healthy young adults[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives,2009,117(7):1089-1094
    [2] Nelin T D,Joseph A M,Gorr M W,et al. Direct and indirect effects of particulate matter on the cardiovascular system[J]. Toxicology Letters,2012,208(3):293-299
    [3] Kang X,Li N,Wang M,et al. Adjutant effects of ambient particulate matter monitored by proteomics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid[J]. Proteomics,2010,10(3):520-531
    [4] Calderón-Garcidueñas L,Engle R,Mora-Tiscareño A,et al. Exposure to severe urban air pollution influences cognitive outcomes, brain volume and systemic inflammation in clinically healthy children[J]. Brain and Cognition,2011,77(3):345-355
    [5] Kam W,Cheung K,Daher N,et al. Particulate matter (PM) concentrations in underground and ground-level rail systems of the Los Angeles metro[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2011,45(8):1506-1516
    [6] Cheng Y H,Chang H P,Yan J W. Temporal variations in airborne particulate matter levels at an indoor bus terminal and exposure implications for terminal workers[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research,2012,12:30-38
    [7] Zuurbier M,Hoek G,Oldenwening M,et al. Commuters' exposure to particulate matter air pollution is affected by mode of transport, fuel type, and route[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives,2010,118(6):783-789
    [8] Gulliver J,Briggs D J. Personal exposure to particulate air pollution in transport microenvironments[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2004,38:1-8
    [9] Fondelli M C,Chellini E,Yli-Tuomi T,et al. Fine particle concentrations in buses and taxis in Florence, Italy[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2008,42(35):8185-8193
    [10] Kaur S,Nieuwenhuijsen M J,Colvile R N. Fine particulate matter and carbon monoxide exposure concentrations in urban street transport microenvironments[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2007,41(23):4781-4810
    [11] 肖珊,余琦,马蔚纯,等. 上海冬季公共交通出行PM1污染暴露特征[J]. 中国环境科学,2012,32(11):1933-1938
    [12] Chan L Y,Lau W L,Zou S C,et al. Exposure level of carbon monoxide and respirable suspended particulate in public transportation modes while commuting in urban area of Guangzhou, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2002,36(38):5831-5840
    [13] Li T T,Bai Y H,Liu Z R,et al. Air quality in passenger cars of the ground railway transit system in Beijing, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2006,367:89-95
    [14] Chan L Y,Lau W L,Lee S C,et al. Commuter exposure to particulate matter in public transportation modes in Hong Kong[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2002,36(21):3363-3373
    [15] 张福庆,李文卿,杜良梅,等. 春季南充城区PM10 污染水平及其水溶性离子特征研究[J]. 环境科学导刊,2014,33(1):11-16
    [16] 方云祥,李铁松,李成柱,等. 南充市大气PM10污染水平的分布特征[J]. 四川环境,2004,23(4):43-45
    [17] Wu D L,Lin M,Chan C Y,et a1. Influences of commuting mode, air conditioning mode and meteorological parameters on fine particle(PM2.5) exposure levels in traffic microenvironments[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research,2013,13:709-720
    [18] 李坤,李友平,刘汉明,等. 南充市车流量对城市空气质量的影响分析[J]. 广东化工,2014,41(15):163-164
    [19] Boogaard H,Frank B,Kamminga J,et al. Exposure to ultrafine and fine particles and noise during cycling and driving in 11 Dutch cities[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2009,43:4234-4242
    [20] 环境保护部. 中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M]. 北京:中国环境出版社,2013:30
    [21] Hitchins J,Morawska L,Wolff R,et al. Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle emissions near a major road[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2000,34:51-59
    [22] Jalava P I,Aakko-Saks P,Murtonen T,et al. Toxicological properties of emission particles from heavy duty engines powered by conventional and bio-based diesel fuels and compressed natural gas[J]. Particle and Fibre Toxicology,2012,9:37
    [23] Karanasiou A,Viana M,Querol X,et al. Assessment of personal exposure to particulate air pollution during commuting in european cities-recommendations and policy implications[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2014,490:785-797
    [24] Nazelle A d,Fruin S,Westerdahl D,et al. A travel mode comparison of commuters' exposures to air pollutants in Barcelona[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2012,59:151-159
    [25] Suárez L,Meslas S,Iglesias V,et al. Personal exposure to particulate matter in commuters using different transport modes (bus, bicycle, car and subway) in an assigned route in downtown Santiago, Chile[J]. Environmental Science Processes and Impacts,2014,16:1307-1309
    [26] Kaur S,Nieuwenhuijsen M,Colvile R. Personal exposure of street canyon intersection users to PM2.5, ultrafine particle counts and carbon monoxide in Central London, UK[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2005,39(20):3629-3641
    [27] McNabola A,Broderick B M,Gill L W. Relative exposure to fine particulate matter and VOCs between transport microenvironments in Dublin: Personal exposure and uptake[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2008,42(26):6496-6512
    [28] 沈俊秀,肖珊,余琦,等. 上海市道路环境PM1、PM2.5和PM10污染水平[J]. 环境化学,2011,30(6):1206-1207
    [29] Huang J,Deng F R,Wu S W,et al. Comparisons of personal exposure to PM2.5 and CO by different commuting modes in Beijing, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2012,425:52-59
    [30] Adams H S,Nieuwenhuijsen M J,Colvile R N. Determinants of fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2001,35(27):4557-4566
    [31] Gomez-Perales J E,Colvile R N,Nieuwenhuijsen M J,et al. Commuters exposure to PM2.5, CO, and benzene in public transport in the metropolitan area of Mexico City[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2004,38(8):1219-1230
    [32] Battarbee J L,Rose N L,Long X. A continuous, high resolution record of urban airborne particulates suitable for retrospective microscopical analysis[J]. Atmospheric Environment,1997,31(2):171-181
    [33] Knibbs L D,De Dear R J,Morawska L. Effect of cabin ventilation aate on ultrafine particle exposure inside automobiles[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2010,44:3546-3551
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1621
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1531
  • PDF下载数:  694
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-01-26
  • 刊出日期:  2015-08-15
李友平, 范忠雨, 李坤, 吴大磊. 不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露及其影响因素[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(8): 1408-1416. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2015.08.2015012610
引用本文: 李友平, 范忠雨, 李坤, 吴大磊. 不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露及其影响因素[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(8): 1408-1416. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2015.08.2015012610
LI Youping, FAN Zhongyu, LI Kun, WU Dalei. Commuter exposure to PM2.5 and its influencing factors in different commuting modes[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2015, 34(8): 1408-1416. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2015.08.2015012610
Citation: LI Youping, FAN Zhongyu, LI Kun, WU Dalei. Commuter exposure to PM2.5 and its influencing factors in different commuting modes[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2015, 34(8): 1408-1416. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2015.08.2015012610

不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露及其影响因素

  • 1.  西华师范大学环境科学与工程学院, 南充, 637009;
  • 2.  广元市利州区环境保护局, 广元, 628000;
  • 3.  广东省社会科学院环境经济与政策研究中心, 广州, 510610
基金项目:

四川省大学生创新训练计划项目(201310638042)

四川省教育厅项目(13ZB0011)

南充市科技局项目(13A0071)

化学合成与污染控制四川省重点实验室项目(CSPC2014-4-2)

四川省科技厅项目(2015JY0094).

摘要: 于2014年4月在南充市城区选择一条固定线路,使用数字直读式颗粒物测定仪连续14 d对自行车、公交车、私家车、摩托车、出租车和步行等6种出行方式PM2.5个体暴露浓度进行监测;获取采样期间的气象数据和大气环境PM2.5浓度数据,以了解不同出行方式PM2.5个体暴露水平及其影响因素.结果表明,不同出行方式中PM2.5个体暴露浓度最高和最低的分别为私家车(51.2±29.2) μg·m-3和出租车(40.2±29.8) μg·m-3;在出行高峰期和工作日,PM2.5个体暴露浓度分别高于非出行高峰期和周末.计入个体暴露时间和呼吸率,最高和最低PM2.5个体暴露量分别为步行(20.9±17.9) μg和出租车(2.8±2.1) μg.应用相关性分析和线性回归分析得出,降雨和风速有利于PM2.5个体暴露浓度降低;大气环境PM2.5浓度对个体暴露量有正相关影响.

English Abstract

参考文献 (33)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回