高级搜索

百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放改造费效评估

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

金侃, 张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 吴学成, 史建勇, 孟炜, 高翔. 百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放改造费效评估[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(2): 1061-1068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201510024
引用本文: 金侃, 张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 吴学成, 史建勇, 孟炜, 高翔. 百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放改造费效评估[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(2): 1061-1068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201510024
shu
JIN Kan, ZHANG Jun, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHANG Yongxing, WU Xuecheng, SHI Jiangyong, MENG Wei, GAO Xiang. Economical assessment of ultra-low pollutants emission technology innovation for coal-fired power plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(2): 1061-1068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201510024
Citation: JIN Kan, ZHANG Jun, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHANG Yongxing, WU Xuecheng, SHI Jiangyong, MENG Wei, GAO Xiang. Economical assessment of ultra-low pollutants emission technology innovation for coal-fired power plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(2): 1061-1068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201510024
shu

百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放改造费效评估

  • 1.

    浙江大学能源清洁利用国家重点实验室, 杭州 310027

  • 2.

    浙江天地环保工程有限公司, 杭州 310003

  • 基金项目:

    环保公益性行业科研专项项目（201509012、201509021）

    国家科技支撑计划课题（2014BAC21B04）

    浙江省环保厅科研计划课题（2015A018）

    浙江省能源集团有限公司科学技术项目（ZNKJ-2016-047）

Economical assessment of ultra-low pollutants emission technology innovation for coal-fired power plants

  • 1.

    State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

  • 2.

    Zhejiang Tiandi Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310003, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 随着我国火电厂大气污染物排放标准的日趋严格，燃煤发电企业陆续开展环保装备升级改造工作，其中部分燃煤电厂已完成大气污染物超低排放改造工作。目前，针对超低排放改造后的成本效益，仍缺乏系统性的分析及评估。基于大量电厂运行DCS及CEMS数据，以某百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放技术改造的情况为实际案例，采用费用-效益分析的方法，对其展开超低排放技术运行经济性评估及研究。同时，结合情景分析，研究负荷、含硫量及年发电时间等关键影响因素变化对污染物脱除成本的影响。结果表明：改造后，污染物（SO2、NOx及PM）脱除成本比改造前增加约13~20元·（MWh）-1，约占上网电价的2.8%~4.4%。改造后，该电厂SO2、NOx及PM排放绩效分别达到0.048、0.109及0.007 g·（kWh）-1，每年可产生环境效益约1 344万元。此外，提升机组运行负荷能显著降低污染物脱除装备运行成本从实际运行平均负荷（66%负荷）提高到满负荷运行，FGD、SCR脱硝及ESP+WESP除尘单位发电量运行成本分别可下降约30.5%、32.1%和38.1%。
    Abstract: As China is increasingly tightening the limits on the emissions of air pollutants from thermal power plants, several coal-fired power plants have been reconstructed with ultra-low emission technology. However, there is currently a lack of theoretical studies on how to apply cost-benefit appraisal analysis to ultra-low pollutant emission technology for coal-fired flue gas. Based on cost-benefit analysis, considering the influence of load, sulfur content, and annual generating hours to pollutant-removal rate, a modelwas constructed to evaluate the economic performance of a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant with pollutant control facilities that have been upgraded to ultra-low pollutant emission technology. The results show that the pollutant (SO2, NOx, and PM)-removal cost increased by about 13-20 yuan·(MWh)-1, accounting for about 2.8%-4.4% of electricity prices. After technical updates, the environmental benefit clearly improved, since the pollutant emissions of SO2, NOx, and PM were reduced by 0.048, 0.109 and 0.007 g·(kWh)-1 due to technological, respectively. Therefore, the environmental benefit is 1.344 million yuan per year. In addition, when the operating load of the unit is increased from 66% to 100%, then the operating costs ofFlue Gas Desulfurization, Selective Catalytic Reduction, and Electronic Stability Program together with Wet ElectroStaticPrecipitator would be reduced by 30.5%, 32.1%, and 38.1%, respectively.
  • 加载中
  • [1] CHENG Zhen, JIANG Jingkun, FAJARDO O, et al. Characteristics and health impacts of particulate matter pollution in China (2001-2011)[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 65:186-194
    [2] LAI H K, TSANG H, THACH T Q, et al. Health impact assessment of exposure to fine particulate matter based on satellite and meteorological information[J]. Environmental Science:Processes & Impacts, 2014, 16(2):239-246
    [3] KANADA M, DONG Liang, FUJITA T, et al. Regional disparity and cost-effective SO2 pollution control in China:A case study in 5 mega-cities[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 61:1322-1331
    [4] 国家统计局能源统计司. 中国能源统计年鉴2013[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2013
    [5] 中国电力企业联合会. 中国电力行业年度发展报告2013[J]. 北京:中国市场出版社, 2013
    [6] 李进, 于海琴, 陈蕊. 燃煤发电厂CO2排放强度计算方法解析与应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(7):3419-3425
    [7] 郭涛, 马永亮, 贺克斌. 区域大气环境中PM2.5/PM10空间分布研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009, 3(1):147-150
    [8] 王书肖, 于超, 郝吉明. 电厂NOx控制政策与技术:美国的经验及对我国的启示[J].环境工程学报, 2011, 5(6):1213-1220
    [9] STREETS D G, CAROLYNE Y, BERGIN M H, et al. Modeling study of air pollution due to the manufacture of export goods in China's Pearl River Delta[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(7):2099-2107
    [10] WANG Yishu, XIE Baichen, SHANG Lifeng, et al. Measures to improve the performance of China's thermal power industry in view of cost efficiency[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 112:1078-1086
    [11] SUN Jian, SCHREIFELS J, WANG Jun, et al. Cost estimate of multi-pollutant abatement from the power sector in the Yangtze River Delta region of China[J]. Energy Policy, 2014, 69:478-488
    [12] USEPA. EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual (6th ed). EPA/452/B-02-001[R]. North Carolina:USEPA, 2002
    [13] 张彩庆. 电厂湿法烟气脱硫系统对环境质量改善及经济性分析[D]. 北京:华北电力大学, 2012
    [14] 黄东. 火电行业氮氧化物控制技术经济分析[D]. 南京:南京信息工程大学, 2013
    [15] YANG Xi, TENG Fei, WANG Gehua. Incorporating environmental co-benefits into climate policies:A regional study of the cement industry in China[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 112:1446-1453
    [16] LI Yuan, ZHU Lei. Cost of energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction in China's iron and steel sector[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 130:603-616
    [17] 李红祥, 王金南, 葛察忠. 中国"十一五"期间污染减排费用-效益分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2013, 33(8):2270-2276
    [18] 刘通浩. 中国电力行业NOx排放控制成本效益分析[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2012
    [19] 张宇. 项目评估实务[M]. 北京:中国金融出版社, 2004
    [20] 潘栋, 王春昌, 丹慧杰, 等. W火焰锅炉低氮燃烧改造策略分析[J]. 热力发电, 2013, 42(12):137-140
    [21] 李显鹏. 燃煤电厂脱硫脱硝电价补偿机制研究[D]. 北京:华北电力大学, 2009
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1680
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1153
  • PDF下载数:  385
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-11-09
  • 刊出日期:  2017-02-18
金侃, 张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 吴学成, 史建勇, 孟炜, 高翔. 百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放改造费效评估[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(2): 1061-1068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201510024
引用本文: 金侃, 张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 吴学成, 史建勇, 孟炜, 高翔. 百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放改造费效评估[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(2): 1061-1068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201510024
shu
JIN Kan, ZHANG Jun, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHANG Yongxing, WU Xuecheng, SHI Jiangyong, MENG Wei, GAO Xiang. Economical assessment of ultra-low pollutants emission technology innovation for coal-fired power plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(2): 1061-1068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201510024
Citation: JIN Kan, ZHANG Jun, ZHENG Chenghang, ZHANG Yongxing, WU Xuecheng, SHI Jiangyong, MENG Wei, GAO Xiang. Economical assessment of ultra-low pollutants emission technology innovation for coal-fired power plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(2): 1061-1068. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201510024
shu

百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放改造费效评估

  • 1. 浙江大学能源清洁利用国家重点实验室, 杭州 310027
  • 2. 浙江天地环保工程有限公司, 杭州 310003
  • 收稿日期:  2015-11-09
基金项目:

环保公益性行业科研专项项目（201509012、201509021）

国家科技支撑计划课题（2014BAC21B04）

浙江省环保厅科研计划课题（2015A018）

浙江省能源集团有限公司科学技术项目（ZNKJ-2016-047）

摘要: 随着我国火电厂大气污染物排放标准的日趋严格，燃煤发电企业陆续开展环保装备升级改造工作，其中部分燃煤电厂已完成大气污染物超低排放改造工作。目前，针对超低排放改造后的成本效益，仍缺乏系统性的分析及评估。基于大量电厂运行DCS及CEMS数据，以某百万燃煤机组烟气污染物超低排放技术改造的情况为实际案例，采用费用-效益分析的方法，对其展开超低排放技术运行经济性评估及研究。同时，结合情景分析，研究负荷、含硫量及年发电时间等关键影响因素变化对污染物脱除成本的影响。结果表明：改造后，污染物（SO2、NOx及PM）脱除成本比改造前增加约13~20元·（MWh）-1，约占上网电价的2.8%~4.4%。改造后，该电厂SO2、NOx及PM排放绩效分别达到0.048、0.109及0.007 g·（kWh）-1，每年可产生环境效益约1 344万元。此外，提升机组运行负荷能显著降低污染物脱除装备运行成本从实际运行平均负荷（66%负荷）提高到满负荷运行，FGD、SCR脱硝及ESP+WESP除尘单位发电量运行成本分别可下降约30.5%、32.1%和38.1%。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (21)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心