高级搜索

4种湿地植物对人工湿地净化生活污水的影响比较

,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

刘文杰, 许兴原, 何欢, 祝栋林, 胥瑞晨, 孙成. 4种湿地植物对人工湿地净化生活污水的影响比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(11): 6313-6319. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505212
引用本文: 刘文杰, 许兴原, 何欢, 祝栋林, 胥瑞晨, 孙成. 4种湿地植物对人工湿地净化生活污水的影响比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(11): 6313-6319. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505212
shu
LIU Wenjie, XU Xingyuan, HE Huan, ZHU Donglin, XU Ruichen, SUN Cheng. Comparison of treatment performances of simulated urban sewage in constructed wetlands planted with four types of wetland plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(11): 6313-6319. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505212
Citation: LIU Wenjie, XU Xingyuan, HE Huan, ZHU Donglin, XU Ruichen, SUN Cheng. Comparison of treatment performances of simulated urban sewage in constructed wetlands planted with four types of wetland plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(11): 6313-6319. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505212
shu

4种湿地植物对人工湿地净化生活污水的影响比较

  • 1.

    污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室, 南京大学环境学院南京 210023

  • 2.

    江苏省农村环境保护与生态修复工程中心, 南京 210023

  • 3.

    江苏省工程咨询中心, 南京 210003

  • 基金项目:

    国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2012ZX07204-001）

Comparison of treatment performances of simulated urban sewage in constructed wetlands planted with four types of wetland plant

  • 1.

    State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China

  • 2.

    Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Rural Environmental Protection and Ecological Remediation, Nanjing 210023, China

  • 3.

    Jiangsu Engineering consulting Center, Nanjing 210003, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 不同类型人工湿地对生活污水的处理效果，受到许多因素的影响，其中不同植物类型的选择，可能会造成人工湿地对主要污染物COD、TN和TP的净化效果发生很大差异。研究了4种湿地植物（菖蒲、香蒲、千屈菜和水葱）在水平潜流、垂直上行流和下行流人工湿地中对人工合成的生活污水的处理效果和主要污染物（COD、TN和TP）去除率的季节变化，通过比较不同植物类型在不同湿地类型中对主要污染物的去除效果分析了可以达到最佳污水净化效果的启动条件。结果表明：香蒲在垂直下行流湿地去除有机污染物效果最好，去除率可达85.55%；水葱在垂直上行流湿地去除TN效果最好，去除率可达57.52%，香蒲在垂直上行流湿地去除TP效果最好，去除率可达84.28%。
    Abstract: The treatment performances of simulated urban sewage in constructed wetlands are affected by many factors, and different types of wetland plants may cause vastly different purification performance. We studied the treatment performances of simulated urban sewage in horizontal subsurface constructed wetlands, upflow vertical constructed wetlands, and downflow vertical constructed wetlands with four different wetlands plants (Acorus calamus,Typha orientalis, Lythrum salicaria, and Scirpus validus), and the seasonal variation in removal efficiency of COD, TN, and TP was determined. Through a comparison of the treatment performances of the simulated urban sewage in the constructed wetlands planted with four types of wetlands plants, we analyzed the optimal start conditions that achieved the best purification performance. The vertical upflow wetlands planted with Scirpus validus achieved the highest removal efficiency of COD with a mean value of 85.55%; vertical downflow wetlands planted with Scirpus validus achieved the highest TN removal efficiency with a mean value of 57.52%; and vertical upflow constructed wetlands planted with Typha orientalis achieved the highest TP removal efficiency with a mean value of 84.28%.
  • 加载中
  • [1] KONNERUP D., KOOTTATEP T., BRIX H. Treatment of domestic wastewater in tropical, subsurface flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna and Heliconia. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35(2): 248-257
    [2] PROCHASKA C. A., ZOUBOULIS A. I., ESKRIDGE K. M. Performance of pilot-scale vertical-flow constructed wetlands, as affected by season, substrate, hydraulic load and frequency of application of simulated urban sewage. Ecological Engineering, 2007, 31(1): 57-66
    [3] KANTAWANICHKUL S., KLADPRASERT S., BRIX H. Treatment of high-strength wastewater in tropical vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with Typha angustifolia and Cyperus involucratus. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35(2): 238-247
    [4] KOOTTATEP T., POLPRASERT C., OANH N. T. K., et al. Septage dewatering in vertical-flow constructed wetlands located in the tropics. Water Science & Technology, 2001, 44(2/3): 181-188
    [5] LI L. F., LI Y. H., BISWAS D. K., et al. Potential of constructed wetlands in treating the eutrophic water: Evidence from Taihu Lake of China. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(6): 1656-1663
    [6] MERLIN G., PAJEAN J. L., LISSOLO T. Performances of constructed wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in rural mountainous area. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 469(1/2/3): 87-98
    [7] 袁东海, 高士祥, 任全进, 等. 几种挺水植物净化生活污水总氮和总磷效果的研究. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(4): 77-80 YUAN Donghai, GAO Shixiang, REN Quanjin, et al. Study on purified efficiency of phosphorus and nitrogen from domestic sewage by several macrophytes in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2004, 18(4): 77-80(in Chinese)
    [8] 赖闻玲, 王玉彬, 彭长连, 等. 四种湿地植物在人工湿地的生长特性研究. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2010, 18(3): 238-244 LAI Wenling, WANG Yubin, PENG Changlian, et al. Growth characteristics of four species in surface-flow constructed wetlands. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2010, 18(3): 238-244(in Chinese)
    [9] 陈毓华, 汪俊三, 梁明易, 等. 华南地区11种高等水生维管植物净化城镇污水效益评价. 农村生态环境, 1995, 11(1): 26-29CHEN Yuhua, WANG Junsan, LIANG Mingyi, et al. The benefits analysis on utilizing 11 species of higher aquatic vascular plants in South China for treating municipal sewage. Rural Eco-Environment, 1995, 11(1): 26-29(in Chinese)
    [10] 白晓龙, 杨春和, 顾卫兵, 等. 不同植物人工湿地净化模拟生活污水效果. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(4): 326-328 BAI Xiaolong, YANG Chunhe, GU weibing, et al. Simulation sewage cleaning abilities of different wetland plants. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(4): 326-328(in Chinese)
    [11] 陈永华, 吴晓芙, 蒋丽鹃, 等. 处理生活污水湿地植物的筛选与净化潜力评价. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28(8): 1549-1554 CHEN Yonghua, WU Xiaofu, JIANG Lijuan, et al. Screening and evaluation of plant purification potential for phytoremediation of sanitary sewage. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2008, 28(8): 1549-1554(in Chinese)
    [12] 崔丽娟, 李伟, 张曼胤, 等. 不同湿地植物对污水中氮磷去除的贡献. 湖泊科学, 2011, 23(2): 203-208 CUI Lijuan, LI Wei, ZHANG Manyin, et al. Different wetland plant roles of removing nitrogen and phosphorus on sewage water. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2011, 23(2): 203-208(in Chinese)
    [13] BRIX H., ARIAS C. A., JOHANSEN N. H., BOD and nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater in an experimental two-stage vertical flow constructed wetland system with recycling//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, vol. 1. Arusha, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2002: 400-410
    [14] AKRATOS C. S., TSIHRINTZIS V. A. Effect of temperature, HRT, vegetation and porous media on removal efficiency of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 2007, 29(2): 173-191
    [15] KAYSER K., KUNST S. Processes in vertical-flow reed beds-Nitrification, oxygen transfer and soil clogging. Water Science & Technology, 2005, 51(9): 177-184
    [16] COLEMAN J., HENCH K., GARBUTT, K., et al. Treatment of domestic wastewater by three plant species in constructed wetlands. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2001, 128(3/4): 283-295
    [17] BELMONT M. A., METCALFE C. D. Feasibility of using ornamental plants (Zantedeschia aethiopica) in subsurface flow treatment wetlands to remove nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand and nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants-A laboratory-scale study. Ecological Engineering, 2003, 21(4/5): 233-247
    [18] 任森华, 袁博, 葛大兵, 等. 不同配置人工湿地处理生活污水的比较. 环境科技, 2014, 27(3): 10-14 REN Senhua, YUAN Bo, GE Dabing, et al. Different configurations constructed wetland sewage treatment comparison. Environmental Science and Technology, 2014, 27(3): 10-14(in Chinese)
    [19] WEBER M., BRÄNDLE R. Some aspects of the extreme anoxia tolerance of the sweet flag, Acorus calamus L. Folia Geobotanica & Phytotaxonomica, 1996, 31(1): 37-46
    [20] PLATZER C. Design recommendations for subsurface flow constructed wetlands for nitrification and denitrification. Water Science & Technology, 1999, 40(3): 257-263
    [21] VYMAZAL J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water, 2010, 2(3): 530-549
    [22] HEALY M. G., RODGERS M., MULQUEEN J. Treatment of dairy wastewater using constructed wetlands and intermittent sand filters. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(12): 2267-2281
    [23] LANGERGRABER G., LEROCH K., PRESSL A., et al. High-rate nitrogen removal in a two-stage subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland. Desalination, 2009, 246(1/2/3): 55-68
    [24] FARAHBAKHSHAZAD N., MORRISON G. M. A constructed vertical macrophyte system for the retention of nitrogen in agricultural runoff. Environment Technology, 2000, 21(2): 217-223
    [25] 李龙山, 倪细炉, 李志刚, 等. 5种湿地植物对生活污水净化效果研究. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(11): 2292-2300 LI Longshan, NI Xilu, LI Zhigang, et al. Sewage cleaning abilities of five wetland plants. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2013, 33(11): 2292-2300(in Chinese)
    [26] TANNER C. C. Plants as ecosystem engineers in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands. Water Science & Technology, 2001, 44(11/12): 9-17
    [27] PANT H. K., REDDY K. R., Lemon E. Phosphorus retention capacity of root bed media of subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 2001, 17(4): 345-355
    [28] WATSON J. T., REED S. C., KADLEC R. H., et al. Performance expactations and loading rates for constructed wetlands//Hammer D. A. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Michigan: Lewis Publishers, 1989
    [29] YANG Yang, XU Zhencheng, HU Kangping, et al. Removal efficiency of the constructed wetland wastewater treatment system at Bainikeng, Shenzhen. Water Science and Technology, 1995, 32(3): 31-40
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2308
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1818
  • PDF下载数:  541
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-07-07
  • 刊出日期:  2016-11-26
刘文杰, 许兴原, 何欢, 祝栋林, 胥瑞晨, 孙成. 4种湿地植物对人工湿地净化生活污水的影响比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(11): 6313-6319. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505212
引用本文: 刘文杰, 许兴原, 何欢, 祝栋林, 胥瑞晨, 孙成. 4种湿地植物对人工湿地净化生活污水的影响比较[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(11): 6313-6319. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505212
shu
LIU Wenjie, XU Xingyuan, HE Huan, ZHU Donglin, XU Ruichen, SUN Cheng. Comparison of treatment performances of simulated urban sewage in constructed wetlands planted with four types of wetland plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(11): 6313-6319. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505212
Citation: LIU Wenjie, XU Xingyuan, HE Huan, ZHU Donglin, XU Ruichen, SUN Cheng. Comparison of treatment performances of simulated urban sewage in constructed wetlands planted with four types of wetland plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(11): 6313-6319. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201505212
shu

4种湿地植物对人工湿地净化生活污水的影响比较

  • 1.  污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室, 南京大学环境学院南京 210023
  • 2.  江苏省农村环境保护与生态修复工程中心, 南京 210023
  • 3.  江苏省工程咨询中心, 南京 210003
  • 收稿日期:  2015-07-07
基金项目:

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2012ZX07204-001）

摘要: 不同类型人工湿地对生活污水的处理效果，受到许多因素的影响，其中不同植物类型的选择，可能会造成人工湿地对主要污染物COD、TN和TP的净化效果发生很大差异。研究了4种湿地植物（菖蒲、香蒲、千屈菜和水葱）在水平潜流、垂直上行流和下行流人工湿地中对人工合成的生活污水的处理效果和主要污染物（COD、TN和TP）去除率的季节变化，通过比较不同植物类型在不同湿地类型中对主要污染物的去除效果分析了可以达到最佳污水净化效果的启动条件。结果表明：香蒲在垂直下行流湿地去除有机污染物效果最好，去除率可达85.55%；水葱在垂直上行流湿地去除TN效果最好，去除率可达57.52%，香蒲在垂直上行流湿地去除TP效果最好，去除率可达84.28%。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (29)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心