干粉菌剂保护剂对溶藻菌溶藻效果与稳定性能的影响

毛林强, 郭惠娟, 薛静静, 徐瑾, 王美娟, 张文艺. 干粉菌剂保护剂对溶藻菌溶藻效果与稳定性能的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2019, (12): 2819-2825. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019011706
引用本文: 毛林强, 郭惠娟, 薛静静, 徐瑾, 王美娟, 张文艺.

干粉菌剂保护剂对溶藻菌溶藻效果与稳定性能的影响

[J]. 环境化学, 2019, (12): 2819-2825. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019011706
MAO Linqiang, GUO Huijuan, XUE Jingjing, XU Jin, WANG Meijuan, ZHANG Wenyi. Influences of dry powder bacteria protective agent on lytic effect and stability of algae-dissolving bacteria[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, (12): 2819-2825. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019011706
Citation: MAO Linqiang, GUO Huijuan, XUE Jingjing, XU Jin, WANG Meijuan, ZHANG Wenyi.

Influences of dry powder bacteria protective agent on lytic effect and stability of algae-dissolving bacteria

[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019, (12): 2819-2825. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2019011706

干粉菌剂保护剂对溶藻菌溶藻效果与稳定性能的影响

    通讯作者: 张文艺, E-mail: zhangwenyi888@sina.com
  • 基金项目:

    水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07202-003/004)和国家自然科学基金(41571471)资助.

Influences of dry powder bacteria protective agent on lytic effect and stability of algae-dissolving bacteria

    Corresponding author: ZHANG Wenyi, zhangwenyi888@sina.com
  • Fund Project: Support by the Water Pollution Control and Control Science and Technology Major Special (2017ZX07202-003/004) and National Natural Science Foundation (41571471).
  • 摘要:

    针对液体菌剂在使用过程中易受杂菌污染以及运输过程中存储不便等问题,选取蔗糖、甘油、谷氨酸钠、脱脂乳粉等4种常见材料做干粉菌剂保护剂,真空冷冻干燥条件下,以小麦粉作为载体,分析不同浓度保护剂作用下的活菌数量及冷冻干燥前后的活菌率变化,作为探究4种保护剂在干粉菌剂制备过程中保护作用与机理的依据.实验结果表明,浓度为10%蔗糖溶液、10%甘油溶液、4%脱脂乳粉溶液以及8%谷氨酸钠溶液做保护剂时活菌率最高、活菌数最大,蔗糖浓度为10%,冷冻干燥前液体菌剂中溶藻菌的数量约为9.65×109 CFU·mL-1,冷冻干燥后干粉菌剂中溶藻菌数量约为15.20×109 CFU·mL-1,溶藻菌成活率为157.51%,高于其他3种保护剂.整个溶藻过程大致持续8 d,在第8 d时,蔗糖作保护剂的菌剂溶藻率达96.04%,以甘油作保护剂菌剂溶藻率达96.11%,菌剂中含有谷氨酸钠和脱脂乳粉,溶藻率分别为94.14%和94.22%.蔗糖和甘油在菌体新陈代谢过程中对菌的保护能力较强,溶藻菌菌体数量多,成活率高,菌体稳定性好,溶藻效果比液体菌剂稍差.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 张丽梅,黎迎,张运,等.喷雾干燥法制备异烟肼PLA缓释微球[J].中国科学:生命科学, 2016,46(6):763-770.

    ZHANG L M, LI Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Spray drying method to prepare isoniazid PLA slow-release microsphere[J]. Science in China:Life Sciences, 2016,46(6):763-770(in Chinese).

    [2] 曹琳,邢亚阁,苏菲烟,等.真空冷冻喷雾干燥下川藏高原冰酒发酵菌剂复合保护剂的配方优化[J].食品工业科技, 2018,39(4):88-93.

    CAO L, XING Y G, SU F Y, et al.Formula optimization of the compound protective agent of the fermentation bacteria compound of the ice wine fermentation agent of the Sichuan-Tibetan plateau of vacuum-frozen spray drying[J]. Food industry technology, 2018,39(4):88-93(in Chinese).

    [3] RAMOS Y G R, CALPENA CAPMANY A C, EGEA GRAS M A, et al. Freeze-drying optimization of polymeric nanoparticles for ocular Flurbiprofen delivery:Effect of protectant agents and critical process parameters on long-term stability[J]. Drug Development Communications, 2017, 43(4):637-651.
    [4] 杨耸月,李灿,王家林,等.乳酸菌菌剂中保护剂的种类和其保护机制[J].饲料研究, 2016(1):8-10, 19.

    YANG S Y, LI C, WANG J L,et al.Types of protective agents and their protection mechanism in lactic acid bacteria agents[J].Feed research, 2016(1):8-10, 19(in Chinese).

    [5] MOAYYEDI M, ESKANDARI M H, RAD A H E, et al. Effect of drying methods (electrospraying, freeze drying and spray drying) on survival and viability of microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469[J]. Journal of Functional Foods, 2018, 40:391-399.
    [6] GWAK H J, LEE J H, KIM T W, et al. Protective effect of soy powder and microencapsulation on freeze-dried Lactobacillus brevis, WK12 and Lactococcus lactis, WK11 during storage[J]. Food Science & Biotechnology, 2015, 24(6):2155-2160.
    [7] GOTOR-VILA A, USALL J, TORRES R, et al. Formulation of the biocontrol agent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, CPA-8 using different approaches:liquid, freeze-drying and fluid-bed spray-drying[J]. Biocontrol, 2017, 62(1):1-11.
    [8] 张千,徐晓晨,王超,等.Anammox菌干粉菌剂制备与保藏技术[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(12):4630-4636.

    ZHANG Q, XU X C, WANG C, et al. Anammox dry powder agent preparation and preservation technology[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(12):4630-4636(in Chinese).

    [9] 刘继馨,王秀丽,彭琛,等.不同冻干保护剂对硼替佐米冻干粉针的影响研究[J].现代药物与临床,2015,30(7):790-794.

    LIU J X, WANG X L, PENG S, et al. Study on the effect of different freeze-dried protectors on boronitemi freeze-dried powder needles[J]. Modern Medicine and Clinical, 2015,30(7):790-794(in Chinese).

    [10] 王大欣,张丹,初少华,等.巨大芽孢杆菌NCT-2冻干菌剂的制备及冻干保护剂响应面优化[J].食品工业科技, 2016,37(11):156-160

    +164. WANG D X, ZHANG D, CHU S H, et al. Preparation of large spore NCT-2 freeze-dried bacteria agent and optimization of the response surface of freeze-drying protectors[J]. Food industry technology, 2016,37(11):156-160+164(in Chinese).

    [11] 陈晶,陈萍,邓文,等.反硝化聚磷菌B8干粉菌剂的制备及应用[J].环境化学,2017,36(5):1148-1155.

    CHEN J,CHEN P,DENG W, et al. Preparation and application of anti-nitrification polyphosphate b8 dry powder agent[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2017, 36(5):1148-1155(in Chinese).

    [12] Schmack M, Chambers J, Dallas S. Evaluation of a bacterial algal control agent in tank-based experiments.[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(7):2435-2444.
    [13] 胡欢. H1菌降解铜绿微囊藻的特性及复合除藻菌剂的研究[D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2010. HU H. Study on the characteristics of H1 bacteria degradation of copper-green microcystic algae and compound algae removal agents[D]. Shanghai:Fudan University, 2010(in Chinese).
    [14] CHANGSAN N, CHAN H K, SEPAROVIC F, et al. Physicochemical characterization and stability of rifampicin liposome dry powder formulations for inhalation.[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2009, 98(2):628-639.
    [15] 李丹丹,李金,黄凤智.微生物菌剂在非洲菊生长期的应用及生态效用[J].农业工程技术,2016,36(26):25. LI D D,LI J,HUANG F Z. Application and ecological utility of microbial agents in the long-term life of microbiological agents in Africa[J]. Agricultural engineering, 2016

    ,36(26):25(in Chinese).

    [16] 熊涛,廖良坤,黄涛,等.植物乳杆菌NCU116菌剂的喷雾干燥制备[J].食品与发酵工业,2015,41(8):23-29.

    XIONG T, LIAO LK, HUANG T, et al. Spray drying preparation of plant Lactobacillus NCU116 bacteria[J]. Food and Fermentation Industry, 2015, 41(8):23-29(in Chinese).

    [17] 陈建勋,王晓峰.植物生理学实验指导(第二版)[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2006. CHEN J X, WANG X F. Experimental guidance on plant physiology (2nd Edition)[M].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology Press, 2006(in Chinese).
    [18] 郭惠娟,张伟,张晓梅,等.溶藻细菌GHJ的溶藻进程与叶绿素降解动力学研究[J].环境化学,2019, 38(6):1274-1281

    GUO H J, ZHANG W, ZHANG X M, et al. Algae-soluble process and chlorophyll degradation dynamics of algae bacteria GHJ[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2019,38(6):1274-1281

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1370
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1370
  • PDF下载数:  23
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-01-17
  • 刊出日期:  2019-12-10

干粉菌剂保护剂对溶藻菌溶藻效果与稳定性能的影响

    通讯作者: 张文艺, E-mail: zhangwenyi888@sina.com
  • 1. 常州大学环境与安全工程学院, 常州, 213164;
  • 2. 江苏龙环环境科技有限公司, 常州, 213164
基金项目:

水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07202-003/004)和国家自然科学基金(41571471)资助.

摘要: 

针对液体菌剂在使用过程中易受杂菌污染以及运输过程中存储不便等问题,选取蔗糖、甘油、谷氨酸钠、脱脂乳粉等4种常见材料做干粉菌剂保护剂,真空冷冻干燥条件下,以小麦粉作为载体,分析不同浓度保护剂作用下的活菌数量及冷冻干燥前后的活菌率变化,作为探究4种保护剂在干粉菌剂制备过程中保护作用与机理的依据.实验结果表明,浓度为10%蔗糖溶液、10%甘油溶液、4%脱脂乳粉溶液以及8%谷氨酸钠溶液做保护剂时活菌率最高、活菌数最大,蔗糖浓度为10%,冷冻干燥前液体菌剂中溶藻菌的数量约为9.65×109 CFU·mL-1,冷冻干燥后干粉菌剂中溶藻菌数量约为15.20×109 CFU·mL-1,溶藻菌成活率为157.51%,高于其他3种保护剂.整个溶藻过程大致持续8 d,在第8 d时,蔗糖作保护剂的菌剂溶藻率达96.04%,以甘油作保护剂菌剂溶藻率达96.11%,菌剂中含有谷氨酸钠和脱脂乳粉,溶藻率分别为94.14%和94.22%.蔗糖和甘油在菌体新陈代谢过程中对菌的保护能力较强,溶藻菌菌体数量多,成活率高,菌体稳定性好,溶藻效果比液体菌剂稍差.

English Abstract

参考文献 (18)

目录

/

返回文章
返回