高级搜索

恢复措施对排土场土壤酶活性和微生物量的影响

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

闫晗, 葛蕊, 潘胜凯, 郭璐璐, 范君, 吴祥云, 张洋. 恢复措施对排土场土壤酶活性和微生物量的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(2): 327-333. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.02.018
引用本文: 闫晗, 葛蕊, 潘胜凯, 郭璐璐, 范君, 吴祥云, 张洋. 恢复措施对排土场土壤酶活性和微生物量的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(2): 327-333. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.02.018
shu
YAN Han, GE Rui, PAN Shengkai, GUO Lulu, FAN Jun, WU Xiangyun, ZHANG Yang. Effects of restoration measures on soil enzyme activities and micobial biomass in the coalmine dump[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(2): 327-333. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.02.018
Citation: YAN Han, GE Rui, PAN Shengkai, GUO Lulu, FAN Jun, WU Xiangyun, ZHANG Yang. Effects of restoration measures on soil enzyme activities and micobial biomass in the coalmine dump[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(2): 327-333. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.02.018
shu

恢复措施对排土场土壤酶活性和微生物量的影响

  • 1.

    辽宁工程技术大学理学院, 阜新, 123000;

  • 2.

    本溪市食品药品检验所, 本溪, 117000

  • 基金项目:

    辽宁省教育厅科研基金资助项目（20060391）资助.

Effects of restoration measures on soil enzyme activities and micobial biomass in the coalmine dump

  • 1.

    College of Science, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, 123000, China;

  • 2.

    Benxi Institute for Food and Drug Control, Benxi, 117000, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 以海州露天矿排土场为研究对象，选取工程复垦、人工种植林地（榆树、刺槐和紫穗槐）和天然草地3种恢复措施作为修复地，以荒裸地作为对照，研究恢复措施对土壤酶活性和土壤微生物量的影响，探讨生态恢复措施对排土场土壤质量的改善情况.结果表明，在同一土层中，修复地土壤脲酶、蛋白酶、蔗糖酶、碱性磷酸酶的活性和土壤微生物量显著高于荒裸地（PPPPP天然草地>工程复垦地，在林种的选择上为乔木>灌木.
    Abstract: Engineering reclamation, planted forests (Ulmus pumila, Robinia pseudoacacia and Amorpha fruticosa) and natural grassland were selected as restoration lands, while bare land was regarded as reference land in Haizhou opencast coalmine dump. In order to find out the best restoration measure, the effects of ecological restoration measures on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass were studied in coalmine dump. The results showed that the activities of urease, protease, invertase, alkaline phosphatase and soil microbial biomass in the restored lands were significantly higher than in the bare land in the same layer (P natural grassland > engineering reclamation, and trees were better than shrubs in coalmine dump.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 郭祥云,李道亮.阜新海州露天煤矿排土场植被与土壤环境关系[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报, 2009,28(5): 823-826
    [2] Cheng J L, Lu Z H. Natural vegetation recovery on waste dump in opencast coalmine area[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2005,16(1): 55-57
    [3] 陈来红,马万里.霍林河露天煤矿排土场植被恢复与重建技术探讨[J].中国水土保持科学, 2011,9(4): 117-120
    [4] 方晰,田大伦,武丽花,等.植被修复对锰矿渣废弃地土壤微生物数量与酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009, 23(4):221-226
    [5] 王海英,宫渊波,陈林武.嘉陵江上游不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物及土壤酶活性的研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(3):172-177
    [6] Zogg G P, Zak D R, Pregitzer K S, et al. Microbial immobilization and the retention of anthropogenic nitrate in a northern hardwood forest[J]. Ecology, 2001, 87(7): 1858-1866
    [7] Pankhurst C E, Hawke B G, McDonald H J, et al. Evaluation of soil biological properties as potential bioindicators of soil health[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1995, 35(7): 1015-1028
    [8] 吴祥云,孙广树,卢慧,等.阜新矿区矸石废弃地立地质量的研究[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2006,25 (2): 42-47
    [9] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:13,108:146-195
    [10] 章家恩.生态学常用实验研究方法与技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006:162-170
    [11] Sparling G P, West A W. A direct extraction method to estimate soil microbial C: Calibration in situ using microbial respiration and 14C labelled cells[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1988,20(3): 337-343
    [12] Brookes P C, Landman A, Pruden G, et al. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1985,17(6): 837-842
    [13] 王艳超,李玉灵,王辉,等.不同植被恢复模式对铁尾矿微生物和酶活性的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2008,27(10):1826-1829
    [14] Omidi H, Tahmasebi Z, Torabi H, et al. Soil enzymatic activities and available P and Zn as affected by tillage practices, canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars and planting dates[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2008,44:443-450
    [15] 黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000,32:50-64
    [16] 闫晗,吴祥云,黄静,等.排土场不同恢复措施下土壤微生物数量特征初探[J].黑龙江农业科学, 2010, (11): 30-34
    [17] 杨成德,龙瑞军,陈秀蓉,等.东祁连山高寒草甸土壤微生物量及其与土壤物理因子相关性特征[J].草业学报, 2007, 16(4): 62-68
    [18] 刘梦云,常庆瑞,齐雁冰,等.宁南山区不同土地利用方式土壤酶活性特征研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2006,14(3): 67-70
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1271
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1271
  • PDF下载数:  480
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-04-10
闫晗, 葛蕊, 潘胜凯, 郭璐璐, 范君, 吴祥云, 张洋. 恢复措施对排土场土壤酶活性和微生物量的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(2): 327-333. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.02.018
引用本文: 闫晗, 葛蕊, 潘胜凯, 郭璐璐, 范君, 吴祥云, 张洋. 恢复措施对排土场土壤酶活性和微生物量的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(2): 327-333. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.02.018
shu
YAN Han, GE Rui, PAN Shengkai, GUO Lulu, FAN Jun, WU Xiangyun, ZHANG Yang. Effects of restoration measures on soil enzyme activities and micobial biomass in the coalmine dump[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(2): 327-333. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.02.018
Citation: YAN Han, GE Rui, PAN Shengkai, GUO Lulu, FAN Jun, WU Xiangyun, ZHANG Yang. Effects of restoration measures on soil enzyme activities and micobial biomass in the coalmine dump[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(2): 327-333. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.02.018
shu

恢复措施对排土场土壤酶活性和微生物量的影响

  • 1.  辽宁工程技术大学理学院, 阜新, 123000;
  • 2.  本溪市食品药品检验所, 本溪, 117000
  • 收稿日期:  2013-04-10
基金项目:

辽宁省教育厅科研基金资助项目（20060391）资助.

摘要: 以海州露天矿排土场为研究对象，选取工程复垦、人工种植林地（榆树、刺槐和紫穗槐）和天然草地3种恢复措施作为修复地，以荒裸地作为对照，研究恢复措施对土壤酶活性和土壤微生物量的影响，探讨生态恢复措施对排土场土壤质量的改善情况.结果表明，在同一土层中，修复地土壤脲酶、蛋白酶、蔗糖酶、碱性磷酸酶的活性和土壤微生物量显著高于荒裸地（PPPPP天然草地>工程复垦地，在林种的选择上为乔木>灌木.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (18)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心