高级搜索

鼠李糖脂对底泥三氯生脱附的影响因素

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

吴文进, 胡勇有, 陈源波, 郭倩. 鼠李糖脂对底泥三氯生脱附的影响因素[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 6898-6906. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507142
引用本文: 吴文进, 胡勇有, 陈源波, 郭倩. 鼠李糖脂对底泥三氯生脱附的影响因素[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 6898-6906. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507142
shu
WU Wenjin, HU Yongyou, CHEN Yuanbo, GUO Qian. Influencing factors on desorption of triclosan from sediment by rhamnolipid[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(12): 6898-6906. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507142
Citation: WU Wenjin, HU Yongyou, CHEN Yuanbo, GUO Qian. Influencing factors on desorption of triclosan from sediment by rhamnolipid[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(12): 6898-6906. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507142
shu

鼠李糖脂对底泥三氯生脱附的影响因素

  • 1.

    华南理工大学环境与能源学院, 广州 510006

  • 2.

    工业聚集区污染控制与生态修复教育部重点实验室, 广州 510006

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目（21277050）

  • 中图分类号: X703

Influencing factors on desorption of triclosan from sediment by rhamnolipid

  • 1.

    College of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 510006, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 采用吸附/脱附平衡实验考察了温度对鼠李糖脂作用下三氯生（TCS）在底泥/水中分配的影响，以及鼠李糖脂浓度、泥水比、反应时间、TCS初始浓度对鼠李糖脂脱附底泥中TCS的影响；并通过Box-Behnken响应曲面法（RSM）确定了鼠李糖脂强化脱附底泥中TCS的影响因素排序、最佳脱附条件和调控策略。结果表明，在283~323 K的温度范围内，温度越高，TCS越容易向水相迁移；鼠李糖脂浓度越大、泥水比越低、时间越长、TCS初始浓度越低，越有利于鼠李糖脂脱附TCS。各影响因素作用排序为：泥水比 > 鼠李糖脂浓度 > pH > 时间；最佳脱附条件：鼠李糖脂浓度2 996.96 mg·L-1、泥水比10 g·L-1、反应时间30 h及pH 7.9。此时，鼠李糖脂对底泥中TCS的最大脱附率可达90.70%。可为鼠李糖脂生物表面活性剂强化受TCS污染水体的原位修复的可行性提供判据。
    Abstract: The effect of temperature on the distribution of TCS in a sediment-water-rhamnolipid system; and the effects of rhamnolipid concentration, ratio of sediment to water, time, and the initial TCS concentration on desorption of TCS from sediment by rhamnolipid were investigated by sorption/desorption equilibrium experiments. The order of the degree of factor influence, optimum desorption conditions, and control strategy were obtained using a response surface orthogonal test (RSM). Results showed that with increased temperature (293 to 323 K), TCS more easily shifted to aqueous phase. The higher the rhamnolipid concentration was, the lower the ratio of sediment to water and the greater the time. The lower the initial TCS concentration was, the more TCS molecules desorbed. The degree of influence of the factors studied was the ratio of sediment to water > rhamnolipid concentration > pH > time. The optimum desorption conditions for rhamnolipid concentration, the ratio of sediment to water, time, and pH were found to be 2 996.96 mg·L-1, 10 g·L-1, 30 h, and 7.95, respectively. An optimum value of TCS desorption percent from sediment (about 90.70%) was obtained under this condition. These findings provide a theoretical basis for application of rhamnolipid biosurfactant in improving in situ ecological restoration of water polluted by TCS.
  • 加载中
  • [1] BEDOUX G., ROIG B., THOMAS O., et al. Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2012, 19(4):1044-1065
    [2] FISS E. M., RULE K. L., VIKESL P. J. Formation of chloroform and other chlorinated byproducts by chlorination of triclosan-containing antibacterial products. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(7):2387-2394
    [3] ZHAO Jianliang, YING Guangguo, LIU Yousheng, et al. Occurrence and risks of triclosan and triclocarban in the Pearl River system, South China:From source to the receiving environment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 179(1/2/3):215-222
    [4] DANN A. B., HONTELA A. Triclosan:Environmental exposure, toxicity and mechanisms of action. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 2011, 31(4):285-311
    [5] WANG Xikui, JIANG Xiajie, WANG Yinan, et al. Occurrence, distribution, and multi-phase partitioning of triclocarban and triclosan in an urban river receiving wastewater treatment plants effluent in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21(11):7065-7074
    [6] MILLER T. R., HEIDLER J., CHILLRUD S. N., et al. Fate of triclosan and evidence for reductive dechlorination of triclocarban in estuarine sediments. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(12):4570-4576
    [7] MCAVOY D. C., SCHATOWITZ B., JACOB M., et al. Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 2002, 21(7):1323-1329
    [8] BEHERA S. K., OH S. Y., PARK H. S. Sorption of triclosan onto activated carbon, kaolinite and montmorillonite:Effects of pH, ionic strength, and humic acid. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 179(1/2/3):684-691
    [9] ARANAMI K., READMAN J. W. Photolytic degradation of triclosan in freshwater and seawater. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(6):1052-1056
    [10] SUAREZ S., DODD M. C., OMIL F., et al. Kinetics of triclosan oxidation by aqueous ozone and consequent loss of antibacterial activity:Relevance to municipal wastewater ozonation. Water Research, 2007, 41(12):2481-2490
    [11] DODD M. C., KOHLER H. P. E., VON GUNTEN U. Oxidation of antibacterial compounds by ozone and hydroxyl radical:Elimination of biological activity during aqueous ozonation processes. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(7):2498-2504
    [12] YANG Bin, YING Guangguo, ZHAO Jianliang, et al. Oxidation of triclosan by ferrate:Reaction kinetics, products identification and toxicity evaluation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 186(1):227-235
    [13] YING Guangguo, YU Xiangyang, KOOKANA R. S. Biological degradation of triclocarban and triclosan in a soil under aerobic and anaerobic conditions and comparison with environmental fate modelling. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 150(3):300-305
    [14] FEDERLE T. W., KAISER S. K., NUCK B. A. Fate and effects of triclosan in activated sludge. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2002, 21(7):1330-1337
    [15] LONG Xuwei, ZHANG Guoliang, SHEN Chong, et al. Application of rhamnolipid as a novel biodemulsifier for destabilizing waste crude oil. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 131:1-5
    [16] CHANG J. H., QIANG Zhimin, HUANG C. P., et al. Phenanthrene removal in unsaturated soils treated by electrokinetics with different surfactants-Triton X-100 and rhamnolipid. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2009, 348(1/2/3):157-163
    [17] WAN Jinzhong, CHAI Lina, LU Xiaohua, et al. Remediation of hexachlorobenzene contaminated soils by rhamnolipid enhanced soil washing coupled with activated carbon selective adsorption. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 189(1/2):458-464
    [18] YAN Ping, LU Mang, YANG Qin, et al. Oil recovery from refinery oily sludge using a rhamnolipid biosurfactant-producing Pseudomonas. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 116:24-28
    [19] ZHANG Xiaoyu, GUO Qian, HU Yongyou, et al. Effects of monorhamnolipid and dirhamnolipid on sorption and desorption of triclosan in sediment-water system. Chemosphere, 2013, 90(2):581-587
    [20] LIN Hui, HU Yongyou, ZHANG Xiaoyu, et al. Sorption of triclosan onto sediments and its distribution behavior in sediment-water-rhamnolipid systems. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2011, 30(11):2416-2422
    [21] ELSAYED E. M., PRASHER S. O. Sorption/desorption behavior of oxytetracycline and sulfachloropyridazine in the soil water surfactant system. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21(5):3339-3350
    [22] WU Wenjin, HU Yongyou, GUO Qian, et al. Sorption/desorption behavior of triclosan in sediment-water-rhamnolipid systems:Effects of pH, ionic strength, and DOM. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 297:59-65
    [23] YU Hui, HUANG Guohe, AN Chunjiang, et al. Combined effects of DOM extracted from site soil/compost and biosurfactant on the sorption and desorption of PAHs in a soil-water system. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 190(1/2/3):883-890
    [24] CHENG K. Y., WONG J. W. C. Combined effect of nonionic surfactant Tween 80 and DOM on the behaviors of PAHs in soil-water system. Chemosphere, 2006, 62(11):1907-1916
    [25] URUM K., PEKDEMIR T., GOPUR M. Optimum conditions for washing of crude oil-contaminated soil with biosurfactant solutions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2003, 81(3):203-209
    [26] MNIF I., SAHNOUN R., ELLOUZE-CHAABOUNI S., et al. Evaluation of B. subtilis SPB1 biosurfactants' potency for diesel-contaminated soil washing:Optimization of oil desorption using Taguchi design. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21(2):851-861
    [27] KALALI A., EBADI T., RABBANI A., et al. Response surface methodology approach to the optimization of oil hydrocarbon polluted soil remediation using enhanced soil washing. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 8(2):389-400
    [28] MULLIGAN C. N., EFTEKHARI F. Remediation with surfactant foam of PCP-contaminated soil. Engineering Geology, 2003, 70(3/4):269-279
    [29] 何敏祯, 胡勇有, 雷超, 等. HDTMA改性沸石对三氯生的吸附特性研究. 环境科学学报, 2013, 33(1):20-29 HE Minzhen, HU Yongyou, LEI Chao, et al. Adsorptive characteristics of triclosan on HDTMA modified zeolite. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2013, 33(1):20-29(in Chinese)
    [30] VIAMAJALA S., PEYTON B. M., RICHARDS L. A., et al. Solubilization, solution equilibria, and biodegradation of PAH's under thermophilic conditions. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(6):1094-1106
    [31] PARIA S. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soil and water. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2008, 138(1):24-58
    [32] KHAN M. N., ZAREEN U. Sand sorption process for the removal of sodium dodecyl sulfate (anionic surfactant) from water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 133(1/2/3):269-275
    [33] ZHOU Wenjun, ZHU Lizhong. Efficiency of surfactant-enhanced desorption for contaminated soils depending on the component characteristics of soil-surfactant-PAHs system. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 147(1):66-73
    [34] MATA-SANDOVAL J. C., KARNS J., TORRENTS A. Influence of rhamnolipids and triton X-100 on the desorption of pesticides from soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(21):4669-4675
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1871
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1454
  • PDF下载数:  497
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-08-15
  • 刊出日期:  2016-12-08
吴文进, 胡勇有, 陈源波, 郭倩. 鼠李糖脂对底泥三氯生脱附的影响因素[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 6898-6906. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507142
引用本文: 吴文进, 胡勇有, 陈源波, 郭倩. 鼠李糖脂对底泥三氯生脱附的影响因素[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 6898-6906. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507142
shu
WU Wenjin, HU Yongyou, CHEN Yuanbo, GUO Qian. Influencing factors on desorption of triclosan from sediment by rhamnolipid[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(12): 6898-6906. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507142
Citation: WU Wenjin, HU Yongyou, CHEN Yuanbo, GUO Qian. Influencing factors on desorption of triclosan from sediment by rhamnolipid[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(12): 6898-6906. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507142
shu

鼠李糖脂对底泥三氯生脱附的影响因素

  • 1.  华南理工大学环境与能源学院, 广州 510006
  • 2.  工业聚集区污染控制与生态修复教育部重点实验室, 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:  2015-08-15
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（21277050）

摘要: 采用吸附/脱附平衡实验考察了温度对鼠李糖脂作用下三氯生（TCS）在底泥/水中分配的影响，以及鼠李糖脂浓度、泥水比、反应时间、TCS初始浓度对鼠李糖脂脱附底泥中TCS的影响；并通过Box-Behnken响应曲面法（RSM）确定了鼠李糖脂强化脱附底泥中TCS的影响因素排序、最佳脱附条件和调控策略。结果表明，在283~323 K的温度范围内，温度越高，TCS越容易向水相迁移；鼠李糖脂浓度越大、泥水比越低、时间越长、TCS初始浓度越低，越有利于鼠李糖脂脱附TCS。各影响因素作用排序为：泥水比 > 鼠李糖脂浓度 > pH > 时间；最佳脱附条件：鼠李糖脂浓度2 996.96 mg·L-1、泥水比10 g·L-1、反应时间30 h及pH 7.9。此时，鼠李糖脂对底泥中TCS的最大脱附率可达90.70%。可为鼠李糖脂生物表面活性剂强化受TCS污染水体的原位修复的可行性提供判据。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (34)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心