高级搜索

透水路面结构对雨水持蓄及污染控制的影响

,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

凌莉, 赵新华, 卢玉迪. 透水路面结构对雨水持蓄及污染控制的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 6956-6962. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507074
引用本文: 凌莉, 赵新华, 卢玉迪. 透水路面结构对雨水持蓄及污染控制的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 6956-6962. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507074
shu
LING Li, ZHAO Xinhua, LU Yudi. Influence of permeable pavement structures on rainwater retention and pollution prevention[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(12): 6956-6962. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507074
Citation: LING Li, ZHAO Xinhua, LU Yudi. Influence of permeable pavement structures on rainwater retention and pollution prevention[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(12): 6956-6962. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507074
shu

透水路面结构对雨水持蓄及污染控制的影响

  • 1.

    天津大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300072

  • 基金项目:

    国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2014ZX07203-009）

  • 中图分类号: X799.1;TU992

Influence of permeable pavement structures on rainwater retention and pollution prevention

  • 1.

    School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 透水路面作为低冲击开发（LID）的一种重要应用措施，被认为是解决现代城市洪涝灾害、水质恶化的重要措施之一。不同透水路面结构对雨水径流的水量水质有不同的作用和影响。为此，依据天津的降雨及下垫面的具体情况建立了草皮砖，透水花砖及透水沥青3种路面结构的小试装置，采用5种降雨模式对其进行实验。结果表明，3种透水路面结构对雨水径流都有较好的削减作用，其中草皮砖结构对雨水的持蓄能力最强，各透水路面结构的总磷（TP）和化学需氧量（COD）去除率分别在90%和50%左右，草皮砖和透水沥青的总氮（TN）去除率在60%以上。
    Abstract: Permeable pavement, one of the main low impact development(LID) applications, is considered as an important technical measure to solve modern urban flooding issues and water quality deterioration problems. Different types of permeable pavement structure have different influences on water quantity and water quality of stormwater runoff. Therefore, test devices of three types of permeable pavement structure:grasspave structure, permeable brick structure, and permeable asphalt structure, were set up based on the rainfall and soil conditions in Tianjin. These were tested with five kinds of rainfall patterns. The test results show that permeable pavement structure provides a great reduction of rainfall runoff. Also, the rainwater retention ability of the grasspave structure was the greatest. The total phosphorus (TP) and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate of permeable pavement structures were about 90% and 50%, respectively, and the total nitrogen (TN) removal rate of both grasspave and permeable asphalt was about 60%.
  • 加载中
  • [1] HOLLIS G. E. Water yield changes after the urbanization of the Canon's Brook catchment, Harlow, England. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 1977, 22(1):61-75
    [2] JENNINGS D. B., JARNAGIN S. T. Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge:A historical perspective in a mid-atlantic subwatershed. Landscape Ecology, 2002, 17(5):471-489
    [3] MAKEPEACE D. K., SMITH D. W., STANLEY S. J. Urban stormwater quality:Summary of contaminant data. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 1995, 25(2):93-139
    [4] DIETZ M. E. Low impact development practices:A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 2007, 186(1/2/3/4):351-363
    [5] 孙艳伟, 魏晓妹, POMEROY C. A. 低影响发展的雨洪资源调控措施研究现状与展望. 水科学进展, 2011, 22(2):287-293 SUN Yanwei, WEI Xiaomei, POMEROY C. A. Review of current research and future directions of low impact development practices for storm water. Advances in Water Science, 2011, 22(2):287-293(in Chinese)
    [6] BOOTH D. B., LEAVITT J. Field evaluation of permeable pavement systems for improved stormwater management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1999, 65(3):314-325
    [7] BRATTEBO B. O., BOOTH D. B. Long-term stormwater quantity and quality performance of permeable pavement systems. Water Research, 2003, 37(18):4369-4376
    [8] 解晓光, 徐勇鹏, 崔福义. 透水路面对路表径流污染的控制效能. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2009,41(9):65-69 XIE Xiaoguang, XU Yongpeng, CUI Fuyi. Controlling efficiency of permeable pavement to runoff pollutant. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009,41(9):65-69(in Chinese)
    [9] 赵飞, 张书函, 陈建刚, 等. 透水铺装雨水入渗收集与径流削减技术研究. 给水排水, 2011, 37(S):254-258 ZHAO Fei, ZHANG Shuhan, CHEN Jiangang, et al. Study on rain runoff infiltration and collecting efficiency and runoffreduction by permeable pavements. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2011, 37(S):254-258(in Chinese)
    [10] 赵现勇, 程方, 张杏娟, 等. 不同结构透水路面对雨水径流污染物的削减作用. 天津城市建设学院学报, 2012, 18(4):280-285 ZHAO Xianyong, CHENG Fang, ZHANG Xingjuan, et al. Removal efficiency of pollutants in rainwater runoff by permeable pavements of different structures. Journal of Tianjin Institute of Urban Construction, 2012,18(4):280-285(in Chinese)
    [11] 田宇, 刘志强. 天津城区雨水利用的前景分析. 环境科学与技术, 2012, 35(3):178-181 TIAN Yu, LIU Zhiqiang. Prospect analysis of urban rainwater harvesting in Tianjin. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 35(3):178-181(in Chinese)
    [12] 孙挺, 倪广恒, 唐莉华, 等. 绿化屋顶雨水滞蓄能力试验研究. 水力发电学报, 2012, 31(3):44-48 SUN Ting, NI Guangheng, TANG Lihua, et al. Experimental study on green roof stormwater retention. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2012, 31(3):44-48(in Chinese)
    [13] 侯立柱, 冯绍元, 丁跃元, 等. 多层渗滤介质系统对城市雨水径流氮磷污染物的净化作用. 环境科学学报, 2009, 29(5):960-967 HOU Lizhu, FENG Shaoyuan, DING Yueyuan, et al. Purification of urban runoff nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants by a multilayer in filtration system. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2009, 29(5):960-967(in Chinese)
    [14] 宋瑞宁, 宫永伟, 李俊奇, 等. 渗透铺装控制城市非点源污染的研究进展. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 37(5):57-63 SONG Ruining, GONG Yongwei, LI Junqi, et al. Progress in controlling urban non-point source pollution by permeable pavement. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 37(5):57-63(in Chinese)
    [15] 冯绍元, 侯立柱, 丁跃元, 等. 多层渗滤介质系统去除城市雨水径流有机污染物. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28(6):1123-1130 FENG Shaoyuan, HOU Lizhu, DING Yueyuan, et al. Removal of organic pollutants from urban runoff by a multilayer infiltration system. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2008, 28(6):1123-1130(in Chinese)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1953
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1635
  • PDF下载数:  557
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-08-13
  • 刊出日期:  2016-12-08
凌莉, 赵新华, 卢玉迪. 透水路面结构对雨水持蓄及污染控制的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 6956-6962. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507074
引用本文: 凌莉, 赵新华, 卢玉迪. 透水路面结构对雨水持蓄及污染控制的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(12): 6956-6962. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507074
shu
LING Li, ZHAO Xinhua, LU Yudi. Influence of permeable pavement structures on rainwater retention and pollution prevention[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(12): 6956-6962. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507074
Citation: LING Li, ZHAO Xinhua, LU Yudi. Influence of permeable pavement structures on rainwater retention and pollution prevention[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 10(12): 6956-6962. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201507074
shu

透水路面结构对雨水持蓄及污染控制的影响

  • 1. 天津大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:  2015-08-13
基金项目:

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2014ZX07203-009）

摘要: 透水路面作为低冲击开发（LID）的一种重要应用措施，被认为是解决现代城市洪涝灾害、水质恶化的重要措施之一。不同透水路面结构对雨水径流的水量水质有不同的作用和影响。为此，依据天津的降雨及下垫面的具体情况建立了草皮砖，透水花砖及透水沥青3种路面结构的小试装置，采用5种降雨模式对其进行实验。结果表明，3种透水路面结构对雨水径流都有较好的削减作用，其中草皮砖结构对雨水的持蓄能力最强，各透水路面结构的总磷（TP）和化学需氧量（COD）去除率分别在90%和50%左右，草皮砖和透水沥青的总氮（TN）去除率在60%以上。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (15)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心