伏牛溪水污染治理效果的数值模拟研究

卿晓霞, 张会波, 周健, 刘增威. 伏牛溪水污染治理效果的数值模拟研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(1): 65-72. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150111
引用本文: 卿晓霞, 张会波, 周健, 刘增威. 伏牛溪水污染治理效果的数值模拟研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(1): 65-72. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150111
Qing Xiaoxia, Zhang Huibo, Zhou Jian, Liu Zengwei. Numerical simulation research of water pollution control effect of Funiu River[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 65-72. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150111
Citation: Qing Xiaoxia, Zhang Huibo, Zhou Jian, Liu Zengwei. Numerical simulation research of water pollution control effect of Funiu River[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 65-72. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150111

伏牛溪水污染治理效果的数值模拟研究

  • 基金项目:

    国家"水体污染控制与治理" 科技重大专项(2012ZX07-307-002)

  • 中图分类号: X522

Numerical simulation research of water pollution control effect of Funiu River

  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 为评估河流治污措施对河道水质改善的效果,用MIKE11模型对伏牛溪河道主要污染物氨氮和CODMn进行了数值模拟。结果表明:河道沿程点源全部截污后,可降低43%的氨氮和65%的CODMn,水质基本达到Ⅴ类水标准;补充20 000 m3/d污水厂尾水(仅深度处理其中6 000 m3/d),河道氨氮浓度将升高12%、CODMn浓度可降低17%,水质不能满足Ⅴ类水标准;补充20 000 m3/d全部深度处理的污水厂尾水,可以降低39%的氨氮和42%的CODMn,水质基本可达到Ⅴ类水标准;采取组合措施后,氨氮可降低12%~37%,CODMn可降低7%~30%。组合措施优于单一措施。
  • 加载中
  • [1] 陈龙.景观河多水源水量水质优化调度研究.天津:天津大学硕士学位论文,2008 Chen Long.Study on the Optimal Attemper of Water Quantity and Water Quality of Landscaping Riverway Multiple Water Resources. Tianjin:A Thesis Submitted to Tianjin University for the Master's Degree,2008
    [2] 王亚炜,杜向群,郁达伟,等.温榆河氨氮污染控制措施的效果模拟.环境科学学报,2013,33(2):479-486 Wang Yawei,Du Xiangqun,Yu Dawei,et al.Assessment of ammonia nitrogen pollution control in Wenyu River by QUAL2K simulation.Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2013,33(2):479-486(in Chinese)
    [3] Lin Guoqing,Zhang Yanran,Sun Yuguo,et al.Optimal design of wetland ecological water in the Shuangtaizi Estuary,Panjin.Procedia Environmental Sciences,2012,12:1404-1410
    [4] 金春久,王超,范晓娜,等.松花江干流水质模型在流域水资源保护管理中的应用.水利学报,2010,(1):86-92 Jin Chunjiu,Wang Chao,Fan Xiaona,et al.Application of water quality model to the river basin water resources protection and management for the mainstream of the Songhua River.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2010,(1):86-92(in Chinese)
    [5] 王庆改,赵晓宏,吴文军,等.汉江中下游突发性水污染事故污染物运移扩散模型.水科学进展,2008,19(4):500-504 Wang Qinggai,Zhao Xiaohong,Wu Wenjun,et al.Advection-diffusion models establishment of water-pollution accident in middle and lower reaches of Hanjiang River.Advances in Water Science,2008,19(4):500-504(in Chinese)
    [6] 成水平,冯玉琴,吴娟,等.城市河流水环境综合治理技术集成与示范.给水排水,2013,39(8):16-19 Cheng Shuiping,Feng Yuqin,Wu Juan,et al.Comprehensive management technology integration and demonstration of urban river water environment.Water and Wastewater Engineering,2013,39(8):16-19(in Chinese)
    [7] 周惠成,李伟,张弛,等.流域防洪减灾工程措施方案优选研究.大连理工大学学报,2009,49(2):267-271 Zhou Huicheng,Li Wei,Zhang Chi,et al.Research on optimization of flood control and disaster mitigation engineering schemes.Journal of Dalian University of Technology,2009,49(2):267-271(in Chinese)
    [8] 卢士强,徐祖信,罗海林,等.上海市主要河流调水方案的水质影响分析.河海大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(1):32-36 Lu Shiqiang,Xu Zuxin,Luo Hailin,et al.Influence of water diversion schemes on water quality of Shanghai river network.Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences),2006,34(1):32-36(in Chinese)
    [9] Doulgeris C.,Georgiou P.,Papadimos D.,et al.Ecosystem approach to water resources management using the MIKE 11 modeling system in the Strymonas River and Lake Kerkini.Journal of Environmental Management,2012,94(1):132-143
    [10] Feleke Arega, Brett F, Sanders. Dispersion Model for Tidal Wetlands. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2004, 130(1): 739-754
    [11] Post D.A.,Kinsey-Henderson A.E.,Stewart L.K.,et al.Optimising drainage from sugar cane fields using a one-dimensional flow routing model:A case study from Ripple Creek,North Queensland.Environmental Modelling & Software,2003,18(8-9):713-720
    [12] 余晓,李翀,王昊,等.额尔古纳河洪水淹没模拟及湿地植被变化分析.水利学报,2011,42(11):1308-1315 Yu Xiao,Li Chong,Wang Hao,et al.Simulation of flood inundation and analysis on dynamic variation of wetlands for Argun River.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2011,42(11):1308-1315(in Chinese)
    [13] 李洋,潘明祥,陈燕.数值模型在长江流域一级河网中的模拟应用.环境科学与技术,2010,33(12F):531-534,565 Li Yang,Pan Mingxiang,Chen Yan,et al.The simulation application of numerical model in the Primary River network of the Yangtze River basin.Environmental Science & Technology,2010,33(F12):531-534,565(in Chinese)
    [14] 王德意,魏文礼.计算水力学理论及应用.西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2001
    [15] 冯民权,郑邦民,周孝德.河流及水库流场与水质的数值模拟.北京:科学出版社,2007
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2609
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1854
  • PDF下载数:  1080
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-01-29
  • 刊出日期:  2014-12-30
卿晓霞, 张会波, 周健, 刘增威. 伏牛溪水污染治理效果的数值模拟研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(1): 65-72. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150111
引用本文: 卿晓霞, 张会波, 周健, 刘增威. 伏牛溪水污染治理效果的数值模拟研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(1): 65-72. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150111
Qing Xiaoxia, Zhang Huibo, Zhou Jian, Liu Zengwei. Numerical simulation research of water pollution control effect of Funiu River[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 65-72. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150111
Citation: Qing Xiaoxia, Zhang Huibo, Zhou Jian, Liu Zengwei. Numerical simulation research of water pollution control effect of Funiu River[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 65-72. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150111

伏牛溪水污染治理效果的数值模拟研究

  • 1. 重庆大学, 三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400045
基金项目:

国家"水体污染控制与治理" 科技重大专项(2012ZX07-307-002)

摘要: 为评估河流治污措施对河道水质改善的效果,用MIKE11模型对伏牛溪河道主要污染物氨氮和CODMn进行了数值模拟。结果表明:河道沿程点源全部截污后,可降低43%的氨氮和65%的CODMn,水质基本达到Ⅴ类水标准;补充20 000 m3/d污水厂尾水(仅深度处理其中6 000 m3/d),河道氨氮浓度将升高12%、CODMn浓度可降低17%,水质不能满足Ⅴ类水标准;补充20 000 m3/d全部深度处理的污水厂尾水,可以降低39%的氨氮和42%的CODMn,水质基本可达到Ⅴ类水标准;采取组合措施后,氨氮可降低12%~37%,CODMn可降低7%~30%。组合措施优于单一措施。

English Abstract

参考文献 (15)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回